اثربخشی مقابله درمانی بر خشونت خانگی و خودکارآمدی زنان خشونت دیده

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. student in general psychology, Department of Psychology, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran.

2 Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

مقدمه: خشونت خانگی هنوز یک معضل جهانی محسوب می شود. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی اثربخشی مقابله درمانی بر خشونت خانگی و احساس خودکارآمدی در زنان خشونت دیده انجام شده است.
روش کار: از بین 115 زن قربانی خشونت در تهران که در ابتدا مورد مصاحبه قرار گرفتند، 40 زن قربانی خشونت ساکن شهر ری، منطقه کهریزک که طی ماه های شهریور تا مهر 1398 به مرکز جامع سلامت حضرت ابوالفضل (ع) مراجعه کرده بودند، به طور تصادفی در دو گروه مقابله درمانی (20 نفر) و گروه شاهد (20 نفر) قرار گرفتند. تمامی شرکت کنندگان چک لیست مشخصات جمعیت شناختی، پرسشنامه خودکارآمدی و پرسشنامه استاندارد سنجش خشونت علیه زنان را در سه مرحله تکمیل کردند. داده ها با تحلیل واریانس با اندازه گیری های مکرر و نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 24 تجزیه و تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: بین گروه‌ها در مرحله پس‌آزمون و پیگیری تفاوت معنی‌داری وجود داشت که می تواند نشان دهنده اثربخشی مقابله درمانی بر خودکارآمدی زنان خشونت دیده و پایداری اثربخشی آن در مرحله پیگیری باشد (P< 0.001).
نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان داد که مقابله درمانی می تواند به عنوان یک مداخله روانشناختی برای افزایش احساس خودکارآمدی و کاهش خشونت علیه زنان مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. این مداخله می تواند زنان قربانی خشونت خانگی را توانمند سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Peterman A, Potts A, O'Donnell M, Thompson K, Shah N, Oertelt-Prigione S, et al. Pandemics and violence against women and children. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development; 2020: Paper 528.
  2. Gracia E, Lila M, Santirso FA. Attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: A systematic review. Eur Psychol 2020; 25(2): 104-21.
  3. Weeks W, Gilmore K. How violence against women became an issue on the national policy agenda. In: Wiseman J. (editor). Making social policy in Australia. London: Routledge; 2020: 141-6.
  4. Alkan Ö, Özar Ş, Ünver Ş. Economic violence against women: A case in Turkey. PLoS One 2021; 16(3): 758-62.
  5. Sikweyiya Y, Addo-Lartey AA, Alangea DO, Dako-Gyeke P, Chirwa ED, Coker-Appiah D, et al. Patriarchy and gender-inequitable attitudes as drivers of intimate partner violence against women in the central region of Ghana. BMC Public Health 2020; 9(14): 1-11.
  6. Harvey P. Domestic violence in the Peruvian Andes 1. In: Harvey P, Gow P. (editors). Sex and violence London: Routledge; 2021: 66-89.
  7. Amir-ud-Din R, Fatima S, Aziz S. Is attitudinal acceptance of violence a risk factor? An analysis of domestic violence against women in Pakistan. J Interpers Violence 2021; 36(7): 1-11.
  8. Rai A, Choi YJ. Domestic violence victimization among south Asian immigrant men and women in the United States. J Interpers Violence 2021; 9(14): 459-62.
  9. Taghdiri MH, Latifi M, Afkari MI, Dasturpour M, Est Ebsari F, Jamalzadeh F. [The effect of educational intervention on increasing women's self-efficacy and awareness to prevent domestic violence]. Health education and health promotion 2018; 3(1): 32-38. (Persian)
  10. Peura P, Aro T, Räikkönen E, Viholainen H, Koponen T, Usher EL, et al. Trajectories of change in reading self-efficacy: A longitudinal analysis of self-efficacy and its sources. Contemp Educ Psychol 2021; 4(1): 32-38.
  11. Nasiri M, Yaghmaei F. [Correlation between self-efficacy and impatience with organizational commitment in faculty members of Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch]. Health Promotion management quarterly 2019; 9(1): 42-50. (Persian)
  12. Fackler S, Malmberg LE, Sammons P. An international perspective on teacher self-efficacy: personal, structural and environmental factors. Teach Teach Educ 2021; 3(1): 32-38.
  13. Hammer M, Scheiter K, Stürmer K. New technology, new role of parents: How parents' beliefs and behavior affect students’ digital media self-efficacy. Comput Hum Behav 2021; 3(1): 855-59.
  14. Agha Yousefi A, Safari Y, Ahmadi S, Abbaspour P. [The effectiveness of coping therapy on psychological markers (stress, quality of life and coping strategies) in type 2 diabetic patients]. Journal of health psychology 2020; 9: 25-40. (Persian)
  15. Roshan M, Agha Yousefi AR, Alipour A, Rezaei A. [The effectiveness of mothers' coping therapy on emotional-behavioral problems and community-friendly behavior of children]. Journal of applied psychology 2015; 9 (1): 1-17. (Persian)
  16. Zarean Q, Farahbakhsh K, Salimi Bejestani H, Motamedi A. [Investigating the conversations of resilient families facing life challenges: A phenomenological study]. Health promotion management quarterly 2021; 10(3): 124-35. (Persian)
  17. Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychol Rep1982; 51(2): 663-71.
  18. Bahrebar S, Ahadi H, Agha Yousefi A. [The effectiveness of emotion regulation and coping therapy training on mood and attitudes toward drugs in adolescents at risk of substance abuse]. Journal of addiction research 2018; 12: 71-98. (Persian)
  19. Tsai CL, Cho MH, Marra R, Shen D. The Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Online Learning (SeQoL). Distance education 2020; 41(4): 472-89.
  20. Agha Yousefi A. [The effect of coping therapy on aggression in mentally retarded children]. Family research quarterly 2012; 8: 291-30. (Persian)
  21. Haj-Yahia MM. Wife abuse  and  its  psychological  consequences as revealed by the first Palestinian National Survey on  Violence  Against    J Fam Psychol 1999; 13(4): 642-62.
  22. Amiri SM. [Investigating the relationship between emotional intelligence of female teachers and violence against them in Bandar Abbas city].    Dissertation.  Qeshm: Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, 2014. (Persian)
  23. Ryff CD, Singer BH. Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. J Happiness Stud 2008; 9(4): 13-39.
  24. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003; 18(2): 76-82.
  25. Hyun MS, Chung HI, Lee YJ. The effect of cognitive–behavioral group therapy on the self-esteem, depression, and self-efficacy of runaway adolescents in a shelter in South Korea. Appl Nurs Res 2005; 18(3): 160-66.
  26. Saedi S. [The relationship between mental health and self-efficacy and self-esteem in students of Payame Noor University of Sanandaj]. Bayhaq quarterly 2019; 24(4): 63-73. (Persian)
  27. Kadivar P, Yousef Vand M, Sarami K, Ashrati A. [Investigating the effect of teacher feedback on formative assessments on self-efficacy and the use of self-regulated learning strategies in third grade middle school students]. Al-Zahra new thoughts quarterly 2014; 10(1): 49-72. (Persian)
مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 25، شماره 4
مرداد و شهریور 1402
صفحه 245-251

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار