مجله اصول بهداشت روانی

مجله اصول بهداشت روانی

طراحی مدل پیش‌بینی رفتار اخلاقی براساس سبک‌های تربیتی و قدرت ایگو: نقش میانجی سازه‌ی خود فراروی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
Mehran Farhadi 1
Arezou Delfan Beiranvand 2
1 Assistant professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics and Sciences Social, Bu- Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
2 Ph.D. student in educational psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics and Sciences Social, Bu- Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
10.22038/jfmh.2023.21800
چکیده
مقدمه: این پژوهش با هدف طراحی مدل پیش­بینی رفتار اخلاقی بر اساس سبک­های تربیتی و قدرت ایگو با میانجی­گری سازه­ ی خودفراروی در میان دانشجویان انجام شد.
روش کار: روش پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی و جامعه­ ی آماری شامل تمام دانشجویان دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان در سال تحصیلی 400-1399 بودند. در این  میان تعداد 285 نفر به شیوه­ی نمونه­گیری خوشه­ای چندمرحله­ ای انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورد استفاده در این پژوهش شامل مقیاس­های رفتار اخلاقی، سبک­های تربیتی و قدرت ایگو بودند. داده ها با روش تحلیل مسیر با استفاده از نرم افزار LISREL تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. 
یافته­ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که مدل پیشنهادی با داده­های تجربی برازش مناسبی دارد (95/0= GFI، 98/0 = IFI، 97/0= CFI). همچنین نتایج نشان داد که اثر سبک­های تربیتی بر رفتار اخلاقی و خودفراروی و اثر قدرت ایگو و خود فراروی بر رفتار اخلاقی معنادار هستند. نتایج حاصل از آزمون سوبل نیز نشان داد که متغیر خودفراوری در ارتباط بین سبک سهل­گیر (01/0 , p< 68/2- Z=)، سبک مقتدر (01/0 , p< 55/2 Z=)، سبک مستبد (01/0 , p< 61/3- Z=) و قدرت ایگو (01/0 , p< ، 56/4 Z=) با رفتار اخلاقی نقش میانجی معناداری دارد.
نتیجه ­گیری: برپایه نتایج می­توان گفت که سبک­های تربیتی، قدرت ایگو و خودفراروی می­توانند وقوع رفتارهای اخلاقی را پیش ­بینی کنند. همچنین، متغیر خودفراروی می­تواند یکی از عوامل تأثیرگذار بر رابطه و پیوند میان سبک­های ­تربیتی و قدرت ایگو با رفتار اخلاقی باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اخلاق
رفتار اخلاقی
سبک‌های تربیتی
قدرت ایگو
خودفراروی
  1. Hidayah R. Students’ self-adjustment, self-control, and morality. Journal of social studies education research 2021; 12(1): 174-93.
  2. Ellemers N, van Nunspeet F. Neuroscience and the social origins of moral behavior: How neural underpinnings of social categorization and conformity affect every day moral and immoral behavior. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2020; 29(5): 513-20.
  3. Bleazby J. Fostering moral understanding, moral inquiry and moral habits through philosophy in schools: A Deweyian analysis of Australia’s Ethical Understanding curriculum. Journal of curriculum studies 2020; 52(1): 84-100.
  4. Scholl JA, Mederer HL, Scholl RW. Motivating ethical behavior. Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Cham: Springer. 2016.
  5. Nie T, Yan Q, Chen Y. Authoritative parenting style and proactive behaviors: Evidence from China? Sustainability 2022; 14(6): 3435.
  6. Tan WN, Yasin M. Parents’ roles and parenting styles on shaping children’s morality. Universal journal of educational research 2020; 8 (3): 70-6.
  7. Fatima S, Dawood S, Munir M. Parenting styles, moral identity and prosocial behaviors in adolescents. Curr Psychol 2020; 41: 902-10.
  8. Esmaeili F, Tahmsebi S, Mohammadi Arya A, Soltani PR. [The relationship between parenting styles and moral development of preschool children mediated by children’s attachment]. Archives of rehabilitation 2021; 22(3): 362-77. (Persian)
  9. Rahbar S, Salaripour E. [Determining the relationship between parenting styles and attachment with moral development in primary school students in Bandar Jask]. Proceeding of the National Conference on Primary Education, 2015: 26-27. (Persian)
  10. Singh N, Anand A. Ego-strength and self-concept among adolescents: A study on gender differences. The international journal of Indian psychology 2015; 3(1): 46-54.
  11. Ziadni MS, Jasinski MJ, Labouvie-Vief G, Lumley MA. Alexithymia, defenses, and ego-strength: Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships with psychological well-being and depression. J Happiness Stud 2017; 18(6): 1799-813.
  12. Besharat MA, Ramesh S, Moghimi E. Spiritual health mediates the relationship between ego-strength and adjustment to heart disease. Health Psychol Open 2018; 5(1): 1-8.
  13. Gharadaghi A. [Structural equation modeling of wisdom determinants based on perception of fathering with the mediating role of ego-strengths in students]. Counseling culture and psychotherapy 2022; 13: 193-218. (Persian)
  14. Yalom ID. [Existential psychotherapy]. Habib S. (translator). Tehran: Ney; 2016. (Persian)
  15. Garcia-Romeu A, Himelstein SP, Kaminker J. Self-transcendent experience: A grounded theory study. Qual Res 2015; 15(5): 633-54.
  16. Sternberg R J, Glück J. Wisdom as self-transcendence. The handbook of wisdom. In: Aldwin CM, Igarashi H, Levenson MR. (editors). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019: 122-43.
  17. Wong PT. Meaning-seeking, self-transcendence, and well-being. Logotherapy and existential analysis. Cham: Springer; 2016: 311-21.
  18. Tornstam L. Maturing into gerotranscendence. The journal of transpersonal psychology 2011; 43(2): 166-80.
  19. Mohagheghi H, Farhadi M, Rashid K, Delfan Beiranvand A. Predicting moral behavior based on moral intelligence and personality traits: The mediating role of the structure self-transcendence. Journal of fundamentals of mental health 2021; 23(4): 273-84.
  20. Hendy NT, Montargot N. Understanding Academic dishonesty among business school students in France using the theory of planned behavior. The international Journal of management education 2019; 17(1): 85-93.
  21. Rimkus LK. A new measure of counterproductive student behavior. M.A. Dissertation. East Carolina: East Carolina University, 2012.
  22. George B, Sims P, Gergen D. The Warren Bennis series. True north: Discover your authentic leadership. University Of Cincinnati - Lindner College of Business; 2007.
  23. Ellemers N, Van Der Toorn J, Paunov Y, Van Leeuwen T. The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2019; 23(4): 332-66.
  24. Bryan H, Burstow B. Understanding ethics in school-based research. Professional development in education 2018; 44(1): 107-19.
  25. Durkheim E. Professional ethics and civic morals. London: Routledge; 2013.
  26. Mitchell MS, Reynolds SJ, Treviño LK. The study of behavioral ethics within organizations: A special issue introduction. Personnel psychology 2020; 73(1): 5-17.
  27. Toda HY, Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector auto regressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 1995; 66(1-2): 225-50.
  28. Hooman H. [Structural equation modeling using LISREL software]. Tehran: Samat; 2005. (Persian)
  29. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford; 2015: 3.
  30. Delfan Beiranvand A, Rashid Kh, Bayat A. [Developing and validating of moral behavior scale among students of Bu-Ali Sina University]. Psychological methods and models 2022. (In press). (Persian)
  31. Baumrind D. Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genet Psychol Monogr 1967; 75: 43-88.
  32. Markstrom CA, Sabino VM, Turner BJ, Berman RC. The psychosocial inventory of ego-strengths: Development and validation of a new Eriksonian measure. J Youth Adolesc 1997; 26(6): 705-32.
  33. Levenson MR, Jennings PA, Aldwin CM, Shiraishi RW. Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2005; 60(2): 127-43.
  34. Loudová I, Lašek J. Parenting style and its influence on the personal and moral development of the child. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2015; 174: 1247-54.
  35. Asakereh H, Diba H. [The role of mother in the formation of moral conscience]. Quarterly journal of morality and religious research 2019; 14: 11-31. (Persian)
  36. Karmakar R. Does parenting style influence the internalization of moral values in children and adolescents? Psychological studies 2015; 60(4): 438-46.
  37. Flannery KM, Smith RL. The effects of age, gender, and gender role ideology on adolescents’ social perspective-taking ability and tendency in friendships. J Soc Pers Relat 2017; 34(5): 617-35.
  38. Duan W, Ho SM. Three-dimensional model of strengths: Examination of invariance across gender, age, education levels, and marriage status. Commun Ment Health J 2017; 53(2): 233-40.
  39. Erikson EH. Youth: Fidelity and diversity. In: Erikson EH. (editor). The challenge of youth. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books; 1965: 1-28.
مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 25، شماره 1
بهمن و اسفند 1401
صفحه 19-27