Language intervention based on cognitive metaphor and time perception in cochlear implanted children

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. student of cognitive science of language, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Tehran, Iran.

2 Emeritus professor of neurolinguistics and clinical linguistics, Department of Speech Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant professor of cognitive neuroscience, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Tehran, Iran

4 Associate professor, Auditory Neuroscience and Audiology, ENT and Head and Neck Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran

5 Assistant professor of psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology, College of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

Introduction: Time perception is a fundamental element of human life. Time can offer a possibility to perceive the world around us, and a sense of self is shaped upon this perception. Unfortunately, current evidence indicates that hearing-impaired children have experienced major difficulties in time perception after cochlear implant surgery because of their early auditory deprivation.
 
Materials and Methods: This research was conducted through a narrative review method. To achieve the principal goal, we first searched some of the most scientific databases and publishers including Elsevier, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science direct. Then, out of 215 most relative articles, 52 articles were selected and examined the role of cognitive metaphors and time perception in language intervention of cochlear implanted children using some main keywords in this field.
 
Results: Examining the structure of conceptual metaphors and the importance of time in language perception among children with cochlear implants indicated that applying intervention protocols based on learning conceptual metaphors and advancing the perception of time in terms of these metaphors is one of the important issues that should be considered in future research.
 
Conclusion: Concerning new educational and therapeutic approaches in language interventions for cochlear implanted children, it is necessary to consider some major issues such as the relationship between conceptual metaphors and understanding of time and strengthen language skills by improving time perception when developing rehabilitative programs.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Nittrouer S, Caldwell-Tarr A, Lowenstein JH. Working memory in children with cochlear implants: Problems are in storage, not processing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77(11): 1886-98.
  2. Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Rajguru SM, Truy E, Gupta C. The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2012; 295(11): 1967-80.
  3. Geers AE, Moog JS, Biedenstein J, Brenner C, Hayes H. Spoken language scores of children using cochlear implants compared to hearing age-mates at school entry. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2009; 14(3): 371-85.
  4. Pisoni DB, Conway CM, Kronenberger W, Henning S, Anaya E. Executive function, cognitive control, and sequence learning in deaf children with cochlear implants. Oxford: The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education; 2010: 439.
  5. Kronenberger WG, Beer J, Castellanos I, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Neurocognitive risk in children with cochlear implants. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140(7): 608-15.
  6. Pisoni DB. Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: Some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception. Ear Hear 2000; 21(1): 70.
  7. Eden S. The effect of 3D virtual reality on sequential time perception among deaf and hard of hearing children. Eur J Spec Needs Educ 2008; 23(4): 349-63.
  8. Martin DS. Advances in cognition, education, and deafness. Washington. D.C.: Gallaudet University Press; 2004.
  9. Senior G. Temporal orientation in hearing impaired people. Disabil Handicap Soc 1988; 3(3): 277-90.
  10. Amadeo MB, Campus C, Pavani F, Gori M. Spatial cues influence time estimations in deaf individuals. iScience 2019; 19: 369-77.
  11. Coull JT, Vidal F, Nazarian B, Macar F. Functional anatomy of the attentional modulation of time estimation. Science 2004; 303(5663): 1506-8.
  12. Ferrandez AM, Hugueville L, Lehéricy S, Poline JB, Marsault C, Pouthas V. Basal ganglia and supplementary motor area subtend duration perception: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2003; 19(4): 1532-44.
  13. Fraisse P. The psychology of time. Westport, USA: Greenwood; 1976.
  14. Guttman SE, Gilroy LA, Blake R. Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences. Psychol Sci 2005; 16(3): 228-35.
  15. Burr D, Banks MS, Morrone MC. Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration. Exp Brain Res 2009; 198(1): 49.
  16. Barakat B, Seitz AR, Shams L. Visual rhythm perception improves through auditory but not visual training. Curr Biol 2015; 25(2): R60-1.
  17. Bylholt C. A review of the literature on the acquisition and development of time concepts in children. CAEDHH Journal/La Revue ACESM 1997; 23(2-3): 119-24.
  18. Kaiser-Grodecka I, Cieszynska J. The Understanding of Time by Deaf Pupils. Irmina; Cieszynska, Jagoda.
  19. Lichter Y. [The miracle of writing: Sequential processes]. Kiryat Bialik: Ach; 1997. (Hebrew)
  20. Bornens MT. Problems brought about by “reading” a sequence of pictures. J Exp Child Psychol 1990; 49(2): 189-226.
  21. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books; 1999.
  22. Fontes R, Ribeiro J, Gupta DS, Machado D, Lopes-Júnior F, Magalhães F, et al. Time perception mechanisms at central nervous system. Neurol Int 2016; 8(1): 5939.
  23. Buhusi CV, Meck WH. What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6(10): 755-65.
  24. Genovesio A, Tsujimoto S, Wise SP. Feature-and order-based timing representations in the frontal cortex. Neuron 2009; 63(2): 254-66.
  25. Allman MJ, Meck WH. Pathophysiological distortions in time perception and timed performance. Brain 2012; 135(3): 656-77.
  26. Haber SN. The primate basal ganglia: parallel and integrative networks. J Chem Neuroanat 2003; 26(4): 317-30.
  27. Matell MS, Meck WH, Nicolelis MA. Interval timing and the encoding of signal duration by ensembles of cortical and striatal neurons. Behav Neurosci 2003; 117(4): 760.
  28. Husain M, Nachev P. Space and the parietal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11(1): 30-6.
  29. Rockland KS, Van Hoesen GW. Some temporal and parietal cortical connections converge in CA1 of the primate hippocampus. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9(3): 232-7.
  30. Cook EP, Pack CC. Parietal cortex signals come unstuck in time. PLoS Biol 2012; 10(10): e1001414.
  31. Del Olmo MF, Cheeran B, Koch G, Rothwell JC. Role of the cerebellum in externally paced rhythmic finger movements. J Neurophysiol 2007; 98(1): 145-52.
  32. Grahn JA, Rowe JB. Feeling the beat: premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception. J Neurosci 2009; 29(23): 7540-8.
  33. Holscher C. Time, space and hippocampal functions. Rev Neurosci 2003; 14(3): 253-84.
  34. Eichenbaum H. Memory on time. Trends Cogn Sci 2013; 17(2): 81-8.
  35. McDonald CJ. Prospective and retrospective duration memory in the hippocampus: is time in the foreground or background?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014; 369(1637): 20120463.
  36. Nielson DM, Smith TA, Sreekumar V, Dennis S, Sederberg PB. Human hippocampus represents space and time during retrieval of real-world memories. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112(35): 11078-83.
  37. Nakazono T, Sano T, Takahashi S, Sakurai Y. Theta oscillation and neuronal activity in rat hippocampus are involved in temporal discrimination of time in seconds. Front Syst Neurosci 2015; 9: 95.
  38. Evans V. 22 How we conceptualize time: language, meaning and temporal cognition. The cognitive linguistics reader 2004: 733-65.
  39. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphor we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1980.
  40. Kovecses Z. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University; 2010.
  41. Eweida S. The realization of time metaphors and the cultural implications: An analysis of the Quran and English Quranic translations. Special project PK. Stockholm University: Department of English.
  42. Keefer LA, Landau MJ, Sullivan D, Rothschild ZK. Embodied metaphor and abstract problem solving: Testing a metaphoric fit hypothesis in the health domain. J Exp Soc Psychol 2014; 55: 12-20.
  43. Pritzker S. The role of metaphor in culture, consciousness, and medicine: A preliminary inquiry into the metaphors of depression in Chinese and Western medical and common languages. Clinical acupuncture and oriental medicine 2003; 4(1): 11-28.
  44. Levitt H, Korman Y, Angus L. A metaphor analysis in treatments of depression: Metaphor as a marker of change. Couns Psychol Q 2000; 13(1): 23-35.
  45. Blamey P, Barry J, Bow C, Sarant J, Paatsch L, Wales R. The development of speech production following cochlear implantation. Clin Linguist Phon 2001; 15(5): 363-82.
  46. Geers AE, Nicholas JG, Sedey AL. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2003; 24(1): 46S-58S.
  47. Tomblin JB, Spencer L, Flock S, Tyler R, Gantz B. A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42(2): 497-511.
  48. Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci 2000; 11(2): 153-8.
  49. Kronenberger WG, Beer J, Castellanos I, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Neurocognitive risk in children with cochlear implants. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140(7): 608-15.
  50. Conway CM, Pisoni DB, Anaya EM, Karpicke J, Henning SC. Implicit sequence learning in deaf children with cochlear implants. Dev Sci 2011; 14(1): 69-82.
  51. Pisoni D, Kronenberger W, Roman A, Geers A. Article 7: Measures of digit span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children following more than 10 years of cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2011; 32(1 Suppl): 60S-74S.
  52. Paul R, Norbury C, Gosse C. Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating. 5th Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier/Mosby; 2018.

 

مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 24، شماره 2
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1401
صفحه 67-73

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار