تصویربرداری عصبی در جرایم جنسی و پارافیلیا: فراخوانی برای هماهنگی ارزیابی های بالینی و تصویربرداری فعلی در جرایم جنسی و پارافیلیا

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

3 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

4 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada

چکیده

مقدمه: ظهور مطالعات تصویربرداری مغزی فرصتی برای ارزیابی تغییرات رفتاری در بیماران مبتلا به اختلالات روانپزشکی و مقایسه نتایج با افراد سالم فراهم کرده است. این مطالعات دارای پیامدهای بالینی و تحقیقاتی به ویژه برای پزشکان پزشکی قانونی و روانشناسانی است که نه تنها باید اختلالات روانپزشکی را تشخیص دهند بلکه باید سطح مسئولیت کیفری را نیز تعیین کنند و میزان خطری را که بیماران ممکن است برای امنیت عمومی ایجاد کنند ارزیابی کنند. با این حال ، مطالعات کمی مقالات فعلی را به طور سیستماتیک بررسی کرده اند. هدف این مقاله جمع بندی و دسته بندی مطالعات موجود است.
روش کار: ما یک جستجوی جامع برای شناسایی همه مقالات موجود در مورد یافته های تصویربرداری عصبی از پارافیلیا انجام دادیم.
یافته ها: 655 مقاله برای این مطالعه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت که از این تعداد 56 مقاله انتخاب شدند. مقالات بر اساس انواع اختلالات جنسی طبقه بندی شدند و در گزارشات موردی و سری موردی (25 نفر) و مطالعات مورد-شاهدی (31 نفر) طبقه بندی شدند. یافته های مهم مقالات انتخاب شده خلاصه شده و مناطق درگیری مغز برجسته شده است.
نتیجه گیری: تصویربرداری عصبی ساختاری و عملکردی ممکن است شبکه عصبی - آناتومی پارافیلیا را روشن کند. این یافته ها پیامدهای تحقیقاتی و بالینی در زمینه روان پزشکی قانونی دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Jordan K, Fromberger P, Müller JL. Could we measure sexual interest using functional imaging? Sexual offender treatment 2015; 10(1): 1-29.
  2. Singer B. Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. The Journal of Sex Research. 1984;20(3):230-40.
  3. Georgiadis JR, Kringelbach ML. The human sexual response cycle: Brain imaging evidence linking sex to other pleasures. Prog Neurobiol 2012; 98(1): 49-81.
  4. Redouté J, Stoléru S, Grégoire M-C, Costes N, Cinotti L, Lavenne F, et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in human males. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 11(3): 162-77.
  5. Stoleru S, Gregoire M-C, Gerard D, Decety J, Lafarge E, Cinotti L, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of visually evoked sexual arousal in human males. Arch Sex Behav 1999; 28(1): 1-21.
  6. Stoléru S, Fonteille V, Cornélis C, Joyal C, Moulier V. Functional neuroimaging studies of sexual arousal and orgasm in healthy men and women: A review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012;36(6): 1481-509.
  7. Poeppl TB, Langguth B, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB. The functional neuroanatomy of male psychosexual and physiosexual arousal: A quantitative meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35(4): 1404-21.
  8. Tenbergen G, Wittfoth M, Frieling H, Ponseti J, Walter M, Walter H, et al. The Neurobiology and Psychology of Pedophilia: Recent Advances and Challenges. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9: 344.
  9. Freund K, Watson R, Dickey R. Does sexual abuse in childhood cause pedophilia: An exploratory study. Arch Sex Behav 1990; 19(6): 557-68.
  10. Hanson RK, Slater S. Sexual victimization in the history of sexual abusers: A review. Ann Sex Res 1988; 1(4): 485-99.
  11. Nunes KL, Hermann CA, Renee Malcom J, Lavoie K. Childhood sexual victimization, pedophilic interest, and sexual recidivism. Child Abuse Negl 2013; 37(9): 703-11.
  12. Akins CK. The role of Pavlovian conditioning in sexual behavior: A comparative analysis of human and nonhuman animals. Int J Comp Psychol 2004; 17(2-3): 241-62.
  13. Marshall WL, Marshall LE. The origins of sexual offending. Trauma Violence Abuse 2000; 1(3): 250-63.
  14. Salter D, McMillan D, Richards M, Talbot T, Hodges J, Bentovim A, et al. Development of sexually abusive behaviour in sexually victimised males: A longitudinal study. Lancet 2003; 361(9356): 471-6.
  15. Blanchard R, Christensen BK, Strong SM, Cantor JM, Kuban ME, Klassen P, et al. Retrospective self-reports of childhood accidents causing unconsciousness in phallometrically diagnosed pedophiles. Arch Sex Behav 2002; 31(6): 511-26.
  16. Blanchard R, Kuban ME, Klassen P, Dickey R, Christensen BK, Cantor JM, et al. Self-reported head injuries before and after age 13 in pedophilic and nonpedophilic men referred for clinical assessment. Arch Sex Behav 2003; 32(6): 573-81.
  17. Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Christensen BK, Dickey R, Klassen PE, Beckstead AL, et al. Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology 2004; 18(1): 3-14.
  18. Joyal CC, Beaulieu-Plante J, de Chantérac A. The neuropsychology of sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sex Abuse 2013; 26(2): 149-77.
  19. Kruger THC, Schiffer B. Neurocognitive and personality factors in homo- and heterosexual pedophiles and controls. J Sex Med 2011; 8(6): 1650-9.
  20. Schiffer B, Vonlaufen C. Executive dysfunctions in pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters. J Sex Med 2011; 8(7): 1975-84.
  21. Becerra García JA. Etiology of pedophilia from a neurodevelopmental perspective: Markers and brain alterations. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed) 2009; 2(4): 190-6.
  22. Hooshmand H, Brawley BW. Temporal lobe seizures and exhibitionism. Neurology 1969; 19(11): 1119.
  23. Lesniak R, Szymusik A, Chrzanowski R. Multidirectional disorders of sexual drive in a case of brain tumour. Forensic Sci 1972; 1(3): 333-8.
  24. Burns JM, Swerdlow RH. Right orbitofrontal tumor with pedophilia symptom and constructional apraxia sign. Arch Neurol 2003; 60(3): 437-40.
  25. Flor-Henry P, Lang RA, Koles ZJ, Frenzel RR. Quantitative EEG studies of pedophilia. Int J Psychophysiol 1991; 10(3): 253-8.
  26. Graber B, Hartmann K, Coffman JA, Huey CJ, Golden CJ. Brain damage among mentally disordered sex offenders. J Forensic Sci 1982; 27(1): 125-34.
  27. Schiffer B, Peschel T, Paul T, Gizewski E, Forsting M, Leygraf N, et al. Structural brain abnormalities in the frontostriatal system and cerebellum in pedophilia. J Psychiatr Res 2007; 41(9): 753-62.
  28. Hucker S, Langevin R, Wortzman G, Bain J, Handy L, Chambers J, et al. Neuropsychological impairment in pedophiles. Can J Behav Sci 1986; 18(4): 440-8.
  29. Mendez M, Shapira JS. Pedophilic behavior from brain disease. J Sex Med 2011; 8(4): 1092-100.
  30. Mendez MF, Chow T, Ringman J, Twitchell G, Hinkin CH. Pedophilia and temporal lobe disturbances. J Neuropsychiatr Clin Neurosci 2000; 12(1): 71-6.
  31. Mohnke S, Müller S, Amelung T, Krüger THC, Ponseti J, Schiffer B, et al. Brain alterations in paedophilia: A critical review. Prog Neurobiol 2014; 122: 1-23.
  32. Cohen LJ, Nikiforov K, Gans S, Poznansky O, McGeoch P, Weaver C, et al. Heterosexual male perpetrators of childhood sexual abuse: A preliminary neuropsychiatric model. Psychiatr Q 2002; 73(4): 313-36.
  33. Hawkins KA, Trobst KK. Frontal lobe dysfunction and aggression: Conceptual issues and research findings. Aggress Violent Behav 2000; 5(2): 147-57.
  34. Cantor JM, Kabani N, Christensen BK, Zipursky RB, Barbaree HE, Dickey R, et al. Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men. J Psychiatr Res 2008; 42(3): 167-83.
  35. Poeppl TB, Nitschke J, Santtila P, Schecklmann M, Langguth B, Greenlee MW, et al. Association between brain structure and phenotypic characteristics in pedophilia. J Psychiatr Res 2013; 47(5): 678-85.
  36. Lett TA, Mohnke S, Amelung T, Brandl EJ, Schiltz K, Pohl A, et al. Multimodal neuroimaging measures and intelligence influence pedophile child sexual offense behavior. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2018; 28(7): 818-27.
  37. Polisois-Keating A, Joyal CC. Functional neuroimaging of sexual arousal: A preliminary meta-analysis comparing pedophilic to non-pedophilic men. Arch Sex Behav 2013; 42(7): 1111-3.
  38. Ristow I, Li M, Colic L, Marr V, Födisch C, von Düring F, et al. Pedophilic sex offenders are characterised by reduced GABA concentration in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 18: 335-41.

39.          Dressing H, Obergriesser T, Tost H, Kaumeier S, Ruf M, Braus DF. [Homosexual pedophilia and functional networks - An fMRI case report and literature review]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2001; 69(1): 539-44. (German)

  1. Walter M, Witzel J, Wiebking C, Gubka U, Rotte M, Schiltz K, et al. Pedophilia is linked to reduced activation in hypothalamus and lateral prefrontal cortex during visual erotic stimulation. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 62(6): 698-701.
  2. Fonteille V, Redouté J, Lamothe P, Straub D, Lavenne F, Le Bars D, et al. Brain processing of pictures of children in men with pedophilic disorder: A positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 21: 101647.
  3. Sartorius A, Ruf M, Kief C, Demirakca T, Bailer J, Ende G, et al. Abnormal amygdala activation profile in pedophilia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008; 258(5): 271-7.
  4. Kärgel C, Massau C, Weiß S, Walter M, Kruger THC, Schiffer B. Diminished Functional Connectivity on the Road to Child Sexual Abuse in Pedophilia. J Sex Med 2015; 12(3): 783-95.
  5. Poeppl TB, Nitschke J, Dombert B, Santtila P, Greenlee MW, Osterheider M, et al. Functional cortical and subcortical abnormalities in pedophilia: A combined study using a choice reaction time task and fMRI. J Sex Med 2011; 8(6): 1660-74.
  6. Cazala F, Fonteille V, Moulier V, Pélégrini-Issac M, De Beaurepaire C, Abondo M, et al. Brain responses to pictures of children in men with pedophilic disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2019; 269(6): 713-29.
  7. Gerwinn H, Pohl A, Granert O, van Eimeren T, Wolff S, Jansen O, et al. The (in)consistency of changes in brain macrostructure in male paedophiles: A combined T1-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging study. J Psychiatr Res 2015; 68: 246-53.
  8. Cantor JM, Blanchard R. White matter volumes in pedophiles, hebephiles, and teleiophiles. Arch Sex Behav 2012; 41(4): 749-52.
  9. Seto MC. Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association; 2008: xvi, 303-xvi.
  10. Schiffer B, Paul T, Gizewski E, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M, et al. Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia. NeuroImage 2008; 41(1): 80-91.
  11. Seto MC. Pedophilia. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2009; 5(1): 391-407.
  12. Hughes JR. Review of medical reports on pedophilia. Clin Pediatr 2007; 46(8): 667-82.
  13. Tost H, Vollmert C, Brassen S, Schmitt A, Dressing H, Braus DF. Pedophilia: Neuropsychological evidence encouraging a brain network perspective. Med Hypotheses 2004; 63(3): 528-31.
  14. Massau C, Kärgel C, Weiß S, Walter M, Ponseti J, Krueger T, et al. Neural correlates of moral judgment in pedophilia. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2017; 12(9): 1490-9.
  15. Habermeyer B, Esposito F, Händel N, Lemoine P, Klarhöfer M, Mager R, et al. Immediate processing of erotic stimuli in paedophilia and controls: A case control study. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13(1): 88.
  16. Schiffer B, Krueger T, Paul T, de Greiff A, Forsting M, Leygraf N, et al. Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2008; 33(1): 23-33.
  17. Karakasi M-V, Vasilikos E, Voultsos P, Vlachaki A, Pavlidis P. Sexual homicide: Brief review of the literature and case report involving rape, genital mutilation and human arson. J Forensic Leg Med 2017; 46: 1-10.
  18. Burgess AW, Hartman CR, Ressler RK, Douglas JE, McCormack A. Sexual homicide: A motivational model. J Interpers Violence 1986; 1(3): 251-72.
  19. MacCulloch MJ, Gray N, Watt A. Brittain's sadistic murderer syndrome reconsidered: An associative account of the aetiology of sadistic sexual fantasy. The journal of forensic psychiatry 2000; 11(2): 401-18.
  20. MacCulloch MJ, Snowden PR, Wood PJW, Mills HE. Sadistic fantasy, sadistic behaviour and offending. Br J Psychiatry 1983; 143(1): 20-9.
  21. Langevin R, Wortzman G, Dickey R, Wright P, Handy L. Neuropsychological impairment in incest offenders. Ann Sex Res 1988; 1(3): 401-15.
  22. Langevin R, Wortzman G, Wright P, Handy L. Studies of brain damage and dysfunction in sex offenders. Ann Sex Res 1989; 2(2): 163-79.
  23. Fruehwald S, Eher R, Frottier P, Aigner M. Self-concepts and interpersonal perceptions of sexual offenders in relation to brain abnormalities. J Psychol Human Sex 2000; 11(3): 49-56.
  24. Müller JL. Are sadomasochism and hypersexuality in autism linked to amygdalohippocampal lesion? J Sex Med 2011; 8(11): 3241-9.
  25. Garnett ES, Nahmias C, Wortzman G, Langevin R, Dickey R. Positron emission tomography and sexual arousal in a sadist and two controls. Ann Sex Res 1988; 1(3): 387-99.
  26. Harenski CL, Thornton DM, Harenski KA, Decety J, Kiehl KA. Increased frontotemporal activation during pain observation in sexual sadism: Preliminary findings. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69(3): 283-92.
  27. Masuda K, Ishitobi Y, Tanaka Y, Akiyoshi J. Underwear fetishism induced by bilaterally decreased cerebral blood flow in the temporo-occipital lobe. BMJ Case Reports 2014; 2014: bcr2014206019.
  28. Othman Z, Razak A, Zakaria R. Zoophilia in a patient with frontotemporal dementia. International medical journal (1994) 2014; 21: 466-7.
  29. Appelbaum PS. Law and psychiatry: Through a glass darkly: Functional neuroimaging evidence enters the courtroom. Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60(1): 21-3.
  30. Husted DS, Myers WC, Lui Y. The limited role of neuroimaging in determining criminal liability: An overview and case report. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 179(1): e9-15.
  31. Gibbels C, Sinke C, Kneer J, Amelung T, Mohnke S, Beier MK, et al. Two sides of one coin: A comparison of clinical and neurobiological characteristics of convicted and non-convicted pedophilic child sexual offenders. J Clin Med 2019; 8(7): 947.
  32. Schiffer B, Amelung T, Pohl A, Kaergel C, Tenbergen G, Gerwinn H, et al. Gray matter anomalies in pedophiles with and without a history of child sexual offending. Transl Psychiatry 2017; 7: e1129.
  33. Habermeyer B, Händel N, Lemoine P, Klarhöfer M, Seifritz E, Dittmann V, et al. LH-RH agonists modulate amygdala response to visual sexual stimulation: A single case fMRI study in pedophilia. Neurocase 2012; 18(6): 489-95.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 23، شماره 2
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1400
صفحه 75-90

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار