دلزدگی زناشویی و وابستگی به شبکه های اجتماعی مجازی: تفاوت ها در زنان و مردان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 MA. in general psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

2 Assistant professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

3 Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd,, Iran

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف پژوهش حاضر، پیش ‌بینی دلزدگی زناشویی بر اساس میزان وابستگی به شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی و تفاوت های آن در زنان و مردان متأهل شهر اصفهان بود.
روش کار: جامعه آماری این پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی شامل مردان و زنان متاهل شهر اصفهان در سال1396 بودند. نمونه این پژوهش 300 نفر (شامل 130 مرد و170 زن) بودند که به روش نمونه‌‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. پرسشنامه‌های میزان وابستگی به شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی صباغ و دلزدگی زناشویی پاینز مورد استفاده قرار گرفتند. یافته‌ها با استفاده از آزمون‌های همبستگی پیرسون، رگرسیون چندگانه گام به گام و تی مستقل به کمک نرم افزار SPSS تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد دلزدگی زناشویی با میزان وابستگی به شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی رابطه مثبت معنادار دارد. ابعاد میزان وابستگی هیجانی به شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی و کاهش تعاملات بین فردی (346/0=β و 257/0= ، 001/0=P ) پیش‌بینی کننده معنادار دلزدگی زناشویی بود. میانگین نمرات زنان در ابعاد وابستگی روانی و وابستگی هیجانی به شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی و دلزدگی زناشویی به طور معنی‌داری بالاتر از میانگین نمرات مردان به دست آمد.
نتیجه گیری: به نظر می رسد میزان وابستگی به شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی نقش مهمی در بروز دلزدگی زناشویی دارد و در نظر داشتن آن در آموزش‌ها و مشاوره‌های پیش از ازدواج، توصیه می گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


1. Pines A. [What can we do to make a dreamy love come true?]. 2
nd ed. Shadab F. (translator). Tehran:
Ghoghnus; 2014. (Persian)
2. Bolton R. [Psychology of human relationships]. 1st ed. Sohrabi HR. (translator). Tehran: Roshd; 2017.
(Persian)
3. Valenzuela S, Halpern D, Katz JE. Social network sites, marriage well-being and divorce: Survey and statelevel evidence from the United States. Comput Human Behav 2014; 36: 94-101.
4. Smith A, Duggan M. Online dating and relationships. Pew Internet and American Life Project 2013. Available
from: URL; http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/
5. Moqbel M, Kock N. Unveiling the dark side of social networking sites: Personal and work-related
consequences of social networking site addiction. Information management 2018; 55(1): 109-19.
6. Stewart JB. Facebook has 50 minutes of your time each day. It wants more. The New York Times. 05 May
2016. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/06/business/facebook-bends-the-rules-of-audienceengagement-to-its-advantage.html?_r=0.
7. Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J. MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring
friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2008; 11(2): 169-74.
8. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Online social networking and addiction: A review of the psychological literature. Int
J Environ Res Public Health 2011; 8(9): 3528-52.
9. Ellison NB, Steinfeld C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook ‘‘friends’’: Social capital and college students’
use of online social network sites. J Comput Mediat Commun 2007; 12(4): 1143-68.
10. Elphinston RA, Noller P. Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and
relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2011; 14(11): 631-5.
11. Kendall TD.The relationship between Internet access and divorce rate. J Fam Econ Issues 2011;32(3):449-60.
12. Chen W, Fan CY, Liu Q X, Zhou ZK, Xie X Ch. Passive social network site use and subjective well-being: A
moderated mediation model. Comput Human Behav 2016; 1(64): 507-14.
13. Beranuy M, Oberst U, Carbonell X, Chamarro A. Problematic internet and mobile phone use and clinical
symptoms in college students: The role of emotional intelligence. Comput Human Behav 2009; 25(5): 1182-7.
14. Takao M, Takahashi S, Kitamura M. Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use. Cyberpsychol
Behav 2009; 12(5): 501-7.
15.Jiang Z, Zhao X. Brain behavioral systems, self-control and problematic mobile phone use: The moderating
role of gender and history of use. Pers Individ Diff 2017; 106: 111-16.
16. Billieux J, Linden MVD, Rochat L. The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone.
Appl Cogn Psychol 2008; 22(9): 1195-210.
17. Yasemi Nejad P, Golmohamadian M. Study the relationship of Big five factors and Cell-phone Over-use in
students. Journal of social psychology research 2011; 1(2):79-105. (Persian)
18. Pines AM, Nunes R. The relationship between career and couple burnout: Implications for career and couple
counseling. J Employ Couns 2003; 40(2): 50-64.
19. Pines AM. Couple burnout: Couses and cures. London: Routledge; 1996.
20. Navidi F. [Investigating and comparing the relationship between marital disturbance and organizational
climate factors in the staff of educational and nursing departments of hospitals in Tehran]. Dissertation. Shahid
Beheshti University, Tehran, 2005. (Persian)
21. Vilca LW, Vallejos M. Construction of the risk of addiction to social networks scale (Cr. ARS). Comput
Human Behav 2015; 48: 190-8.
22. Konok V, Gigler D, Bereczky BM, Miklósi Á. Humans' attachment to their mobile phones and its relationship
with interpersonal attachment style. Comput Human Behav 2016; 61: 537-47.
23. Sabbagh Z. [The relationship among personality traits and level of dependency on social networks with marital
burnout]. Dissertation. Yazd University, Yazd, 2018. (Persian)
24. Hand M. An Exploration of the relationship among online social network usage, intimacy, social comparison
tendencies and relationship satisfaction. Ph.D. Dissertation. Louisiana Tech University, 2010.
25. Khojastemehr R, Ahmadi A, Sodani M, Shiralinia Kh. [The effectiveness of contextual therapy on emotional
intimacy and couples marital quality]. Journal of applied psychology 2015; 9(3): 79-96. (Persian)
26. Fox J, Osborn JL, Warber KM. Relational dialectics and social networking sites: The role of Facebook in
romantic relationship escalation, maintenance, conflict, and dissolution. Comput Human Behav 2014; 35:527-34.
27. McDaniel BT, Drouin M, Cravens JD. Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social
media sites and marital satisfaction. Comput Human Behav 2017; 66: 88-95.
28. Abedini Y, Zamani B. [Investigating motivation, type and rate of mobile use in university students]. Journal
of contemporary psychology 2013; 7(2): 73-86. (Persian)
29. Müller KW, Dreier M, Beutel ME, Duven E, Giralt S, Wölfling K. A hidden type of internet addiction? Intense
and addictive use of social networking sites in adolescents. Comput Human Behav 2016; 55: 172-7.
MARITAL BURNOUT AND SOCIAL NETWORKS SABBAGH, SALEHZADEH, ZAREEI
Fundamentals of Mental Health, 2020 Sep-Oct http://jfmh.mums.ac.ir 300
30. Pines AM. Adult attachment styles and their relationship to burnout: A preliminary and crosscultural
investigation. Work and stress 2004; 18(1): 66-80.
31. Safiporian S, Ghadami A, Khakpour M, Sodani M, Mehrafarid M. [The effect of group counseling using
interpersonal therapy (IPT) in reducing marital boredom in female divorce applicants]. Nursing education 2015;
5(1): 1-11. (Persian)
32. Naderi F, Azadmanesh P. [Comparison of marital disturbance, family function and intimacy of male and
female employees]. Journal of new findings in psychology 2012; 7: 97-112. (Persian)
33. Nazari A, Fallahzadeh H, Nazarboland N. [Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on
women’s marital burnout and marital quality]. Journal of applied psychology 2017; 3: 433-53. (Persian)
34. Nikobakht N, Karimi Y, Bahrami H. [Couple burnout among fertilized and unfertilized women referred to
Valieasr Reproductive Center]. Iranian journal of epidemiology 2011; 7(1): 32-37. (Persian)