سهم دانش و نگرش جنسی در پیش‌بینی میزان صمیمیت و رضایت جنسی زوجین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

M.Sc. in clinical psychology, Kermanshah Health Center, Kermanshah, Iran

چکیده

مقدمه: خانواده به عنوان ابتدایی ترین نهاد اجتماعی از اهمیت فراوانی برخوردار است و حفظ سلامت آن به ارتقای سلامت اجتماعی منجر خواهد شد. در همین راستا این پژوهش با هدف تعیین سهم دانش و نگرش جنسی در پیش­بینی میزان صمیمیت و رضایت جنسی زوجین اجرا گردید.
روش کار: جامعه­ی آماری در این پژوهش همبستگی شامل  زوجین 20 تا 40 ساله­ی ساکن شهر کرمانشاه در سال 1394 بود که حداقل دو سال از ازدواج­شان گذشته است. حجم نمونه 134 نفر (67 زوج) بود که با روش خوشه­ا­ی چندمرحله­ای انتخاب گردید. ابزار پژوهش شامل مقیاس دانش و نگرش جنسی، پرسشنامه­ی صمیمیت جنسی باگاروزی و شاخص رضایت جنسی بود. داده ها با روش­های آمار توصیفی (میانگین و انحراف استاندارد) و آمار استنباطی (آزمون همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه) و با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS تحلیل شدند.
یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد بین دانش و نگرش جنسی با صمیمیت و رضایت جنسی رابطه­ی مثبت و معناداری (01/0≥ p ) وجود دارد اما تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه نشان داد که دانش جنسی با وجود همبستگی با صمیمیت و رضایت جنسی، توان پیش­بینی آن­ها را ندارد ولی نگرش جنسی می­تواند پیش­بین مناسبی برای صمیمیت و رضایت جنسی باشد.
نتیجه گیری: به نظر می رسد هرچه سطح دانش و نگرش جنسی زوجین بالاتر باشد، میزان صمیمیت و رضایت جنسی آنها نیز بیشتر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


  1. Herlbert DF, Apt C, Rabehl SM. Key variables to understanding female sexual satisfaction: an examination of women in nondistressed marriages. J Sex Marital Ther 1993; 19(2): 154-65.
  2. Hamidi F, Afrooz GA, Kiamanesh AR, Rasoulzadeh Tabatabai SK. [Investigating the family structure of runaway girls and the effectiveness of family therapy and supportive therapy in changing it]. Journal of new findings in psychology 2004; 7(2): 114-27. (Persian)
  3. Lawrence E, Penerson A, Bunde M, Barry RA, Brock RL, Fazio E, et al. Objective ratings as predictors of marital Satisfaction trajectories. J Soc Pers Relat 2008; 25(3): 445-66.
  4. Bagarozzi DA. Marital intimacy needs questionnaire: Preliminary report. Am J Fam Ther 1997; 25(3):
    285-90.
  5. Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 52(3): 511-24.
  6. Esmaeilbaigi Z, golamrezaei HR. [The miracle of intimacy, the key to successful life and relationship]. 3rd Tehran: New Generation Thought; 2009. (Persian)
  7. Botlani S, Ahmadi SA, Bahrami F, Shahsiah M, Mohebbi S. [Effect of attachment-based couple therapy on sexual satisfaction and intimacy]. Journal of fundamentals of mental health 2010; 12(2): 496-505. (Persian)
  8. Azartash F. [The effectiveness of sexual education training on reducing marital conflict in women who referring to health home of Regional 2 Tehran city]. MA. Dissertation. Tehran: Science and Research University, 2011. (Persian)
  9. Flynn KE, Lin L, Bruner DW, Cyranowski JM, Hahn EA, Jeffery DD, et al. Sexual satisfaction and the importance of sexual health to quality of life throughout the life course of U.S. adults. J Sex Med 2016; 13(11): 1642-50.
  10. Nordstrom MPC, Westercamp N, Jaoko W, Okeyo T, Bailey RC. Medical male circumcision
    is associated with improvements in pain during intercourse and sexual satisfaction in Kenya. J Sex Med 2017; 14(4): 601-12.
  11. Lawrance K, Byers ES. Sexual satisfaction in long term heterosexual relationship: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Pers Relat 1995; 2(4): 267-85.
  12. Klapilova K, Brody S, Krejcova L, Husarova B, Binter J. Sexual satisfaction, sexual compatibility, and relationship adjustment in couples: The role of sexual behaviors, orgasm, and men’s discernment of women’s intercourse orgasm. J Sex Med 2014; 12(3): 667-75.
  13. Chan JL, Letourneau J, Salem W, Cil AP, Chan SW, Chen LM, et al. Sexual satisfaction and quality of life in survivors of localized cervical and ovarian cancers following fertility-sparing surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 139(1): 141-7.
  14. Seftel AD. Re: Female partners of men with Peyronie's disease have impaired sexual function, satisfaction, and mood, while degree of sexual interference is associated with worse outcomes. J Urol 2016; 196(5): 1516-7.
  15. Qian R, Chen Z, Tang L, Zhang W. Postpartum adverse effects and sexual satisfaction following cesarean delivery in Beijing. Int J Gynaecol Obestet 2016; 132(2): 200-5.
  16. Chistopher FS, Sprecher S. Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. J Marr Fam 2000; 62(4): 999-1017.
  17. Mahdavi N. [Comparison of sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction, gender role, attachment styles and nervousness in individuals on the verge of divorce and ordinary people]. MA. Dissertation. Tehran: Science and Culture University; 2011. (Persian)
  18. Beutel ME, Stöbel-Richter Y, Brahler E. Sexual desire and sexual activity of men and woman across their life spans: results from a representative German community survey. BJU Int 2008; 101(1): 76-82.
  19. Gallegos EC, Villarruel AM, Gomez MV, Onofre DJ, Zhou Y. Research brief: Sexual communication and knowledge among Mexican parents and their adolescent children. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2007; 18(2): 28-34.
  20. Mirzaee Jahed A, Saberi H. [The prediction of marital disaffection of women based on their sexual attitudes and their husbands' tendency toward dark personality]. Journal of applied psychology 2019; 13(3): 371-89. (Persian)
  21. Naderi F, Haidarei AR, Hosainzadeh Maleki Z. [The relationship between knowledge and sexual attitude components of love and marital satisfaction with domestic violence in married employees of government offices in Ahvaz city]. Journal of women and culture 2009; 1(1): 28-45. (Persian)
  22. McCarthy BW. Sexual dysfunction. In: Hersen M. (editor). Clinical behavioral therapy: Adult and children. New York: John Wiley; 2002: 198-9.
  23. Ouhadi B. [Human sexual desires and behaviors]. 8th Isfahan: Sadegh Hedayat; 2006. (Persian)
  24. Spence S. [Psychosexual therapy]. Touzandehjani H. (translator). 3rd Tehran: Peik Farhang; 2006. (Persian)
  25. Beam CR, Marcus K, Turkheimer E, Emery RE. Gender differences in the structure of marital quality. Behav Genet 2018; 48(3): 209-23.
  26. Meldrum RM, Liamputtong P, Wollersheim D. Sexual health knowledge and needs: young Muslim women in Melbourne, Australia. Int J Health Serv 2016; 46(1): 124-40.
  27. Alomair N, Alageel S, Davies N, Bailey JV. Sexually transmitted infection knowledge and attitudes among Muslim women worldwide: A systematic review. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2020; 28(1): 1731296.‏
  28. Shahkarami M, Davarneia R, Zahrakar K, Gohari SH. [The effect of sex education on the sexual intimacy of married women]. Psychiatric nursing 2014; 2(1): 34-42. (Persian)
  29. Besharat MA, Rafiezadeh B. [Prediction of sexual satisfaction and adjustment levels according to job variables, commitment, intimacy, and sexual knowledge and attitude]. Journal of family psychology 2016; 3(1): 31-46. (Persian)
  30. Shalani B, Siyahkamari R. [Correlation of sexual knowledge and attitude with sexual function in female nurses]. Journal of Qom University of Medical Sciences 2018; 12(9): 66-74. (Persian)
  31. Mottaqi M. [A study of couples' sexual knowledge and attitude, and its relationship with sexual satisfaction, in education employees, district 4 Tehran city]. MA. Dissertation. Tehran: Alzahra University, College of psychology and education science; 2009. (Persian)
  32. Hassanzadeh R. [Research methods for behavioral sciences]. 9th Tehran: Savalan; 2010: 130-1. (Persian)
  33. Besharat MA, Ranjbar Kelagari E. [Development and validation of Sexual Knowledge and Attitude Scale]. Contemporary psychology 2013; 8(1): 21-32. (Persian)
  34. Hudson WW, Harrison DF, Crosscup PC. A short‐form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships. J Sex Res 1981; 17(2): 157-74.
  35. Mohammadzadeh A, Rezaei A, Alizadeh Mansour E. [The comparison of life and sexual satisfaction among two personality type of A and B according to attachment style]. Journal of psychological science 2019; 18: 307-16. (Persian)