مقدمه: هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر پیش بینی خیانت زناشویی بر اساس عوامل خانوادگی زوجین مراجعه کننده به مراکز اورژانس اجتماعی شهرستان ساری است. روش کار: روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، شامل کلیه شامل کلیه زوجین مراجعه کننده به اورژانس اجتماعی شهرستان ساری است. حجم نمونه، 200 نفر تعیین شده که با روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه ای تصادفی انتخاب شده اند. یافته‌ها: رابطه بین شرایط اقتصادی- گرایش به خیانت زناشویی زوجین در سطح خطای کوچک‌تر از 05/0 و اطمینان 95/0 معنی‌دار و معکوس است. هم چنین، بین دو متغیر شرایط اجتماعی- گرایش به خیانت زناشویی زوجین نشان داد که رابطه بین این دو متغیر در سطح خطای کوچک‌تر از 01/0 و اطمینان 99/0 معنی‌دار و معکوس است. نتیجه آزمون همبستگی بین دو متغیر شرایط فرهنگی- گرایش به خیانت زناشویی زوجین نشان داد که رابطه بین این دو متغیر در سطح خطای کوچک‌تر از 01/0 و اطمینان 99/0 معنی‌دار و معکوس است. رابطه بین شرایط مذهبی- گرایش به خیانت زناشویی زوجین در سطح خطای کوچک‌تر از 05/0 و اطمینان 95/0 معنی‌دار و معکوس است. نهایتا نتیجه آزمون همبستگی پیرسون بین دو متغیر شرایط تحصیلی- گرایش به خیانت زناشویی زوجین نشان داد که رابطه بین این دو متغیر در سطح خطای کوچک‌تر از 05/0 و اطمینان 95/0 معنی‌دار و معکوس است. نتیجه‌گیری: به نظر می رسد که شرایط خانوادگی زناشویی در افزایش گرایش افراد به روابط فرا زناشویی تاثیر به سزایی دارد.
Momeni Javid M, Kazemi M. [The effectiveness of psychotherapy interventions on spouse betrayal in married women in Tehran, 2010-2011]. Journal of social research 2013; 6: 139-55. (Persian)
Sarokhani B. [Family sociology]. Tehran: Soroush; 2000. (Persian)
Seiidan F, Khalife Lu S. [Family and women's job promotion: An investigation of the factors affecting the job promotion of women working in governmental departments in Osko, with emphasis on family]. Journal of women's socio-psychological studies (women's studies) 2008; 6(2): 89-110. (Persian)
Brown, EM. Patterns of infidelity and their treatment. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2001.
Fathi M, Fekriazad H, Ghaffari G, Bolhari J. [Factors of betrayal in married women married]. Social welfare quarterly 2013; 13: 109-13. (Persian)
Kalantari A, Roshanfekr P, Javaheri J. [Three decades of researches about divorce causes in Iran: A review]. Women’s strategic studies 2011; 14: 120-62. (Persian)
Ogwokhademhe M, Ishola CA. Factors responsible for extramarital affairs as perceived by married adults in Lagos, Nigeria. Problems of psychology in the 21st century 2013; 6: 37-46.
Buunk BP. Extramarital sex in the Netherlands. Alternative lifestyles 1980; 3: 11-39.
Millar B, Baker A. Behavioral reactions to emotional and sexual infidelity: Mate abandonment versus mate retention. Evolution in behavioral sciences 2017; 11(4): 336-40.
Kaveh S. [Spouses and infidelity: Investigating the effective factors in identifying the characteristics, constituents and consequences of infidelity among spouses]; Tehran: Sokhan; 2008. (Persian)
Chuick CD. Gender and infidelity: A study of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and extrarelational involvement. Dissertation. University of Iowa, 2013.
Momeni Javid M, Naderi Neobangani Z. [Extracurricular relations: Causes, consequences, theory, and treatment]. Tehran: Shabahang; 2014. (Persian)
Mark KP, Janssen E, Milhausen RR. Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Arch Sex Behav 2011; 40(5): 971-82.
Malik N, Nawaz Y, Mehmood B, Riaz F, Khaver Mushtaq S, Khan MI. Causes and consequences of extra-marital relations in married women: A case study of Darulaman Sargodha. J Soc Sci 2014; 5: 2044.
Fair RC. Theory of extramarital affairs. Journal of political economy 1978; 86(1): 45-61.
Omarzu J, Miller AN, Schultz C, Timmerman A. Motivations and emotional consequences related to engaging in extramarital relationships. Int J Sex Health 2012; 24(2): 154-62.
Noorbakhsh A. [Investigating the relationship between family conditions and tendency to addiction in students of Payam Noor University]. Dissertation. Payam Noor University, Department of Social Sciences, 2012. (Persian)
Nasri S, Taymouri R, Hamidi Mejlej M. [Modeling the relationship of family factors affecting on academic motivation on high school students in Tehran]. Research in school and virtual learning 2014; 1(3): 39-49. (Persian)
Whatley M. Attitudes toward Infidelity Scale, Department of Psychology, Valdosta State University; 2006.
Abdollahzadeh H. [Introducing the Mark Watley infidelity attitude scale]. Tehran: Azmoon Yar Pouya Institute; 2010. (Persian)
Navabi J, Mohammadi Aria A. [The relationship between early maladaptive schemas with respect to marital relationships among married people]. Journal of psychiatric nursing 2015; 3(4): 18-27. (Persian)
Schensul SL, Mekki-Berrada A, Nastasi BK, Singh R, Burleson JA, Bojko M. Men’s extramarital sex, marital relationships and sexual risk in urban poor communities in India. J Urban Health2006; 83: 614-24.
Fathi M, Fekazad H, Ghaffary G, Bolhari J. [Factors of married women engagement in marital infidelity]. Quarterly journal of social welfare 2014; 13: 109-37. (Persian)
Sami A, Nazari MA, Mohsenzadeh F, Taheri M. [Multiple relationships of attachment styles, personality dimensions, and marital satisfaction with marital breakdown]. Journal of women's educational and cultural education 2014; 9: 79-93. (Persian)
Yousefi N, Karimipour BH, Amani A. [Investigating the model of religious beliefs, conflict resolving styles, and marital commitment with attitude toward marital infidelity]. Journal of applied counseling 2009; 7(1): 47-64. (Persian)
Ajam AA. [Explaining the relationship between marital conflict and attitude to betrayal in marriage and its role in academic achievement]. Proceeding of the First National Electronic Conference on Applied and Research Approaches in the Humanities and Management, Electronic, Third Millennium Research Institute 2014; https://www.civilica.com/Paper-NCHM01-NCHM01_085.html. (Persian)
)