مدل سازی پیش بینی میزان رضایت عاطفی و جنسی در روابط عاشقانه بر اساس سبک دلبستگی به والدین با توجه به نقش واسطه ای احساس گناه در روابط عاشقانه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. student in psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Bojnord branch, Bojnord, Iran.

2 Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Assistant professor of psychology, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Quchan branch, Quchan, Iran.

10.22038/jfmh.2024.82392.3167

چکیده

 مقدمه: این پژوهش با هدف پیش‌بینی میزان رضایت عاطفی و جنسی در روابط عاشقانه بر اساس سبک دلبستگی به والدین با توجه به نقش واسطه‌ای احساس گناه در روابط عاشقانه انجام شد.
روش‌ کار: جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل کلیه افراد متاهل ساکن شهر مشهد در سال‌های 1403-1402بود. بدین ترتیب 400 نفر به روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای چند مرحله ای انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه رضایت جنسی لارسون (LSSQ)، مقیاس صمیمیت زناشویی (MIS)، پرسشنامه سبک های دلبستگی هازان و شیور، پرسشنامه احساس گناه بین فردی (IGQ-67) بود. ما داده‌ها را با استفاده از نرم‌افزار LISREL 8.80 و مدل تحلیل مسیر تجزیه و تحلیل کردیم. یافته‌ها: شاخص‌های کلی برازندگی مدل را نشان داد. ضریب مسیر از سبک دلبستگی ایمن و دوسوگرا تا احساس گناه از نظر آماری معنادار بود. همچنین ضریب مسیر از احساس گناه به هیجان منفی و معنادار بود (01/0>P). نتایج ضرایب غیرمستقیم سبک دلبستگی بر رضایت عاطفی و جنسی با میانجیگری احساس گناه معنی دار نبود. به عبارت دیگر، احساس گناه نقش واسطه ای در رابطه بین سبک های دلبستگی و رضایت عاطفی و جنسی در روابط عاشقانه ایفا نمی کند
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به نتایج، پیشنهاد می‌شود زوج درمانگران و مشاوران خانواده به سبک‌های دلبستگی و احساس گناه به‌عنوان متغیرهای تأثیرگذار برای درک بهتر مشکلات زوجین توجه بیشتری داشته باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Tasew AS, Getahun KK. Marital conflict among couples: The case of Durbete town, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Cogent Psychol 2021; 8(1): 1903127.
  2. Abdollahi E, Shokrgozar S, Sheerojan M, Golshahi M, Zare R. [Relationship between sexual satisfaction and mental health in married older women]. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences 2021; 30(1): 14-27. (Persian)
  3. Holdsworth E, Trifonova V, Tanton C, Kuper H, Datta J, Macdowall W, et al. Sexual behaviours and sexual health outcomes among young adults with limiting disabilities: Findings from third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (NASTAL-3). BMJ Open 2019; 8(7): e019219.
  4. Zegeye B, Woldeamanuel GG, Negash W, Shibre G. Sexual satisfaction and its associate factors among married women in Northern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 2020; 30(2): 169-78.
  5. Denes A, Crowley JP, Winkler KL, Dhillon A, Ponivas AL, Bennett M. Exploring the effects of pillow talk on relationship satisfaction and physiological stress responses to couples’ difficult conversations. Commun Monogr 2020; 87(3): 267-90.
  6. Tolmacz R, Bachner-Melman R, Lev-Ari L, Almagor K. Interparental conflict and relational attitudes within romantic relationships: The mediating role of attachment orientations. J Soc Pers Relat 2022; 39(6): 1648-68.
  7. Feeney JA. Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR. (editors). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford; 2016: 435-63.
  8. Molero F, Shaver PR, Fernández I, Recio P. Attachment insecurities, life satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction from a dyadic perspective: The role of positive and negative affect. Eur J Soc Psychol 2017; 47(3): 337-47.
  9. Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 52(3): 511-24.
  10. Waters HS, Waters TEA, Waters E. From internal working models to script‑like attachment representations. In: Thompson RA, Simpson JA, Berlin LJ. (editors). Attachment: The fundamental questions. New Jersey: Guilford; 2021: 111-19.
  11. Raby KL, Fraley RC, Roisman GI. Categorical or dimensional measures of attachment. Attachment (Lond) 2021; 70: 70-77.
  12. Fine NB, Ben-Zion Z, Biran I, Hendler T. Neuroscientific account of guilt-and shame-driven PTSD phenotypes. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2023; 14(2): 2202060.
  13. Mirshamshiri M.Investigating the relationship between guilt and marital conflicts of women and their husbands.Proceeding of the International Congress on Women's Role in Family and Community Health, Tehran, Iran, 2016: 20-28.
  14. Bellemare C, Sebald A, Suetens S. Guilt aversion in economics and psychology. J Econ Psychol 2019; 73: 52-9.
  15. Zagefka H, Andrew N, Boelen B, Cummings O, Denton R, Harris S, et al. Attachments to mother, father, and romantic partner as predictors of life satisfaction. The Family Journal 2022; 30(4): 570-8.
  16. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford; 2011.
  17. Bahrami N, Sharif Nia H, Soliemani MA, Haghdoost AA. [Validity and reliability of the Persian version of Larson sexual satisfaction questionnaire in couples]. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2016; 23(3): 344-56. (Persian)
  18. Walker AJ, Thompson L. Intimacy and intergenerational aid and contact among mothers and daughters. J Marriage Fam 1983; 45(4): 841-9.
  19. Mohammadi K, Rahnama P, Mohammadi Tabar S, Montazeri A. [Validation of the Persian version of the 19-question intimacy and sexual activity questionnaire]. Payesh 2014; 13(5): 601-7. (Persian)
  20. Besharat MA. [Development and validation of Adult Attachment Inventory]. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2011; 30: 475-9.
  21. O'Connor LE, Berry JW, Weiss J, Bush M, Sampson H. Interpersonal guilt: The development of a new measure. J Clin Psychol 1997; 53(1): 73-89.
  22. Abbasi Rami M, Yasrebi K, Yaqoubi A.[Psychometric characteristics of interpersonal guilt questionnaire in students].Contemporary psychology2015; 10: 1009-13. (Persian)
  23. Kareshki H. [Linear structural relations in humanities research]. Tehran: Avay-e-Noor; 2021. (Persian)
  24. Leonardi J, Gazzillo F, Gorman BS, Kealy D. Understanding interpersonal guilt: Associations with attachment, altruism, and personality pathology. Scand J Psychol 2022; 63(6): 573-80.
  25. Overall NC, Girme YU, Lemay Jr EP, Hammond MD. Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: the benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners. J Pers Soc Psychol 2014; 106(2): 235.
  26. Teimurpur N, Mushtaq N, Shahbaz A. [The relationship between attachment styles and age with sexual guilt in female students]. Horizon of science 2010; 17(4): 60-68. (Persian)
  27. Fimiani R, Leonardi J, Gorman B, Gazzillo F. Interpersonal guilt, impostor phenomenon, depression, and anxiety. Psychology hub 2021; 38(2): 31-40.
  28. Çarıkçı-Özgül DN, Işık Ü. Exploring adult attachment and anxiety: The role of intolerance of uncertainty and social support. Current psychology 2024; 43(20): 1-9.
  29. Zagefka H, Andrew N, Boelen B, Cummings O, Denton R, Harris S, et al. Attachments to mother, father, and romantic partner as predictors of life satisfaction. The family journal 2022; 30(4): 570-8.
  30. Knapp DJ, Durtschi JA, Clifford CE, Kimmes JG, Barros‐Gomes PA, Sandberg J. Self‐esteem and caregiving in romantic relationships: Self‐and partner perceptions. Pers Relatsh 2016; 23(1): 111-23.
  31. Tatum AK, Niedermeyer T, Schroeder J, Connor JJ. Shame as a moderator of attachment and sexual satisfaction. Psychol Sex 2023; 15(4): 505-16.
  32. Tolmacz R, Cohen R, Leiman, R, Gerber Z. The association between attachment orientation and Relationship authenticity and satisfaction: The mediating role of concern. N Am J Psychol 2022; 23(1): 27-44.
  33. Flicker SM, Sancier-Barbosa F, Moors AC, Browne L. A closer look at relationship structures: Relationship satisfaction and attachment among people who practice hierarchical and non-hierarchical polyamory. Arch Sex Behav 2021; 50(4): 1401-17.
  34. Malan D, Della Selva PC. Lives transformed: A revolutionary method of dynamic psychotherapy. London: Karnac Books; 2007.
  35. Greenbaum R, Bonner J, Gray T, Mawritz M. Moral emotions: A review and research agenda for management scholarship. J Organ Behav 2020; 41(2): 95-114.
  36. Piotrowski K. Perfectionism and identity processes in two domains: Mediational roles of worry, rumination, indecisiveness, shame, and guilt. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 18-64.

 

 

مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 26، شماره 6
آذر و دی 1403
صفحه 391-398

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار