Introduction: This research is a comparison between ordinary guidance school girl students' emotional learning competency and smart school girl student’s emotional learning in Roudsar in the academic year of 2012-13. Materials and Methods: The method of the research was causal- comparative, and the instruments used were; emotional competency questionnaire of Golman (1998). In order to determine the permanency of questionnaire Alpha correlation of Cronbach was used and the number attained, was 0.84. Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation) was used and to analyze the data the independent t-test was used. Results:The analysis of the data showed that there is not a meaningful difference between emotional learning competency of the two groups of students in the elements of self-awareness, self-regulation, self-motivation, social awareness, and social skills (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results showed that there is not a meaningful difference between emotional learning competency of ordinary school girl students and smart school girl students.
Tavoosi Roudsari, R. (2016). A comparison of the emotional competences of learning of middle girl students in regular and smart schools in Roudsar city. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 18(Special Issue), 443-448. doi: 10.22038/jfmh.2016.7898
MLA
Rezvane Tavoosi Roudsari. "A comparison of the emotional competences of learning of middle girl students in regular and smart schools in Roudsar city", Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 18, Special Issue, 2016, 443-448. doi: 10.22038/jfmh.2016.7898
HARVARD
Tavoosi Roudsari, R. (2016). 'A comparison of the emotional competences of learning of middle girl students in regular and smart schools in Roudsar city', Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 18(Special Issue), pp. 443-448. doi: 10.22038/jfmh.2016.7898
VANCOUVER
Tavoosi Roudsari, R. A comparison of the emotional competences of learning of middle girl students in regular and smart schools in Roudsar city. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 2016; 18(Special Issue): 443-448. doi: 10.22038/jfmh.2016.7898