The effect of neurofeedback training on attention rate in proficient track and field ‎athletics

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor of child and adolescent ‎psychiatry, Psychiatry and Behavioral ‎Sciences Research Center, Mashhad ‎University of Medical Sciences

2 Associate professor of motor-behavior, ‎Faculty of physical education and sport ‎sciences, Tehran University ‎

3 M.Sc. in physical education and sport ‎sciences, Payam-e-Noor University, Branch ‎of south Tehran

4 PhD. student in motor‏ ‏behavior, Faculty of ‎physical education and sport sciences, ‎Ferdowsi University‏ ‏of Mashhad Internatinal ‎Campus ‎

5 Assistant professor of psychiatry, Psychiatry ‎and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, ‎Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Introduction: Neurofeedback has been used for diagnosis and treatment of different disorders; in addition, it has been used for improvement of healthy person's daily activities and its quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of neurofeedback training on the rate attention in track and field athletes.
Materials and Methods: This clinical trial study was performed with pre and post-tests along with control and placebo groups. Therefore 36 track and field athletics was chosen voluntarily and purposefully, the subjects was selected randomly in 3 groups that each of the group had 12 members (experimental, placebo and control). Intervention was made in a form of increased beta-wave in Cz and Fz over 12 sessions. Attention was evaluated by software of attention test. For data analysis, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, One-way ANOVA and Post-Hoc (LSD) were used.
Results: One-way ANOVA analysis showed a significant relationship between the actual neurofeedback training and increasing athletes’ attention in different groups (P=0.002). Post-Hoc test revealed a significant discrepancy between interventional group and control group (P=0.003) and interventional group and Placebo group (P=0.002); while, there was no significant difference between Placebo group and control group (P=0.249). The result demonstrated a significant difference between training and increasing attention in the experimental group.
Conclusion: Considering to the positive effect of nerofeedback, perhaps this method can be used as auxiliary training when skills education for increasing learning and improving athletes’ attention.

Keywords

References

1. Steinberg M, Othmer S. The 20 hour solution: Training minds to concentrate and self-regulate naturally without medication. USA: Robert Reed; 2004: 48-92.
2. Bakhshayesh AR. [Biofeedback (General concepts, principles, methods and application)]. Yazd: Yazd University; 2010: 15-70. (Persian)
3. Hammond DC. What is neurofeedback? J Neurother 2006; 10(4): 25-36.
4. Jordanova NP, Demerdziera A. Biofeedback training for peak performance in sport- case study. Macedonian journal of medical sciences 2010; 3(2): 113-18.
5. Vernon DJ. Can neurofeedback training enhance performance? An evaluation of evidence with implications for future research. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2005; 30: 347-64.
6. Hadian Fard H, Najarian B, Shekarshekan H, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. [Preparation and construction of the Persian from of continuous performance test]. Journal of psychology 2000; 4(4): 388-404. (Persian)
7. Egner T, Gruzelier JH. EEG biofeedback of low beta band components: Frequency-specific effects on variables of attention and event-related brain potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 131-9.
8. Doppelmayr M, Weber E. Effects of SMR and theta/beta neurofeedback on reaction times, spatial abilities, and creativity. J Neurother 2011; 15: 115-29.
9. Mahini SM. [The effect of neurofeedback training on the athletic performance of chess national team]. MA. Dissertation. Tehran: Tehran University, College of physical education and sport sciences, 2010: 45-60. (Persian)
10. Hafeznia MR. [An introduction to the research method in humanities/total revision with additions]. Tehran: Samt; 1998: 164-5. (Persian)
11. Zare H, Farzad V, Alipour A, Nazer M. [Comparing various attention functions in drivers with/without crash and their relation with age]. Journal of transportation 2012; 9(1): 45-52. (Persian)
12. Milton J, Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Small SL. The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused. Neuroimage 2007; 35(2): 804813.
13. Dehghani-Arani F, Rostami R, Rahimi-Nejad A. [The effectiveness of neurofeedback therapy on psychological health and brain waves pattern in patients with opioid dependency who treated with drug]. Journal of research on psychological health 2007; 1(4): 77-85. (Persian)
14. Rostami R. [The effect of neurofeedback on performance of athletics]. Comprehensive Psychiatric Center; 2008: 3-8. (Persian)
15. Thomas LJ. Neurofeedback and your brain: A beginner’s manual. New York: Medical Center and Brain Research Lab; 2002: 1-10.
Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 15, Issue 60 - Serial Number 60
January and February 2014
Pages 312-318

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics