Effect of forgiveness therapy on coping with marital conflicts and quality of life

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student in consulting, Islamic Azad University, Branch of Qom, Instructor of Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran-South Branch, Iran

2 Ph.D. in psychology, Assistant professor of psychology, Islamic Azad University, Branch of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Conflicts, rejection, jealousy and couples resentment are factors that damage physical and mental health. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of forgiveness therapy on conflicts and life quality of women who referred to the Aramesh counseling centers.
 
Materials and Methods: This experimental study was done in women referred to Aramesh counseling centers in 2015 and they had obtained the scores above 25 in the marital test. The sample size of 30 subjects (convenient method) selected and randomly divided into two experimental and control groups. The experimental group received 10 ninety minutes sessions of forgiveness therapy program. After intervention, the subjects' marital conflicts and quality of life were measured again. Analysis of data was performed by multivariate analysis test for differential scores and t-test.
 
Results: The results showed that forgiveness therapy had an impact on reducing women's marital conflicts and increasing life quality in general and this effect was significant (P<0.05).
 
Conclusion: Based on the results, forgiveness therapy can impact positively on marital conflicts and quality of life among women.

Keywords


  1. Movahhedi A. [Key points in successful married]. Qom: Earth; 2015. (Persian)
  2. 2. Pourmohseni Kalverdi F. The relationship of brain-behavioral systems with forgiveness and marital satisfaction. Contemporary psychology 2013; 8(2): 17-26. (Persian)
  3. Enright RD, Fitzgibbons RP. Empirical validation of the process model of forgiveness therapy: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope; 2015.
  4. Somohano VC. Mindfulness, attachment style and conflict resolution. Behaviors in romantic relationships. MA. Dissertation. Humboldt State University, 2013.
  5. Weisskirch R, Delevi R. Attachment style and conflict resolution skills technology use in relationship dissolution. Comput Hum Behav 2013; 29: 2530-4.
  6. Dildar S, Aisha S, Sumaira Y. Intimate enemies: Marital conflicts and conflict resolution styles in dissatisfied married couples. Middle-East J Sci Res 2013; 15(10): 1433-9.
  7. Macaskill A. Defining forgiveness: Christian clergy and general population perspectives. J Pers 2005; 5: 1237-69.
  8. Çardak M. The relationship between forgiveness and humility: A case study for university students. Acad J 2013; 8: 425-30.
  9. Aalgaard RA, Bolen RM, Nugent WR. A literature review of forgiveness as a beneficial intervention to increase relationship satisfaction in couples therapy. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 2016; 26(1): 46-55.
  10. McCullough ME, Kurzban R, Tabak BA. Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behav Brain Sci 2013; 36: 1-15.
  11. Peets K, Hodges EV, Salmivalli C. Forgiveness and its determinants depending on the interpersonal context of hurt. J Experim Child Psychol 2013; 114(1): 131-45.
  12. Afkhami E, Bahari F, Fatehizadeh M. The relationship between forgiveness and marital conflicts in Yazd province. J Fam Res 2007; 9: 442-32. (Persian)
  13. Fincham FD. Forgiveness, family relationships and health. In: Toussaint LL. (editors). Theories relating forgiveness to better health. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2015: 255-70.
  14. Paleari FG, Regalia C, Fincham FD. Measuring offence-specific
    forgiveness in marriage: The Marital Offence-specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS). Psychol Assess2009; 21(2): 194-209.
  15. Park JH, Enright RD, Essex MJ, Zahn-Waxler C, Klatt JS. Forgiveness intervention for female South Korean adolescent aggressive victims. J Appl Dev Psychol 2013; 34: 268-76.
  16. Flanagan KS, Vanden Hoek KK, Ranter JM, Reich HA. The potential of forgiveness as a response for coping with negative peer experiences. J Adolesc 2012; 35(5): 1215-23.
  17. Orathinkal J, Vansteenwegen A. The effect of forgiveness on marital satisfaction in relation to marital stability. Contemp Fam Ther 2006; 28(2): 251-60.
  18. Malone A, Meyer DD, Tarlton T, Wasielewski L, Reuben P, West C, et al. The relationship between forgivenes and emotional well-being. [cited 2011]. Available from: http://counselingoutfitters.com/ vistas/vistas11/Article_23.pdf
  19. Van loon RC. A cognitive development intervention for cleargy: Forgiveness education. Ph.D. Dissertation. Noothern Ilinois University, 1997.
  20. Perez J. A forgiveness protocol for adolesencts with disruptive behavior: A pilot study. Ph.D. Dissertation. Regent University, 2007.
  21. Toussaint LL, Marschall JC, Williams DR. Prospective associations between representative sample of United States adults. Depression Research and Treatment 2012; 2012: 1-10.
  22. Kadivi Zand MM. [Family therapy]. New journal of psychotherapy 2003; 7: 29-38. (Persian)
  23. Hargrave TD. Families and forgiveness: A theoretical and therapeutic framework. Ther Couples Fam 1994; 2: 339-48.
  24. Lawler-Row KA, Hyatt-Edwards L, Wuensch KL, Karremans JC. Forgiveness and health: The role of attachment. Pers Relat 2011; 18: 170-83.
  25. Riek BM, Mania EW. The antecedents and consequences of interpersonal forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Pers Relat 2012; 19(2): 304-25.
  26. Maltby J, Macaskill A, Gillet R. The cognitive nature of forgiveness: using cognitive strategies of primary appraisal and coping to describe the process of forgiving. J Clin Psychol 2007; 63: 555-65.
  27. Brüne M, Juckel G, Enzi B. An eye for an eye? Neural correlates of retribution and forgiveness. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e73519.

28. Johnson HD, Wernli MA, LaVoie JC. Situational, interpersonal, and intrapersonal characteristic associations with adolescent conflict forgiveness. J Genet Psychol 2013; 174(3): 291-315.

  1. Van Tongeren DR, Burnette JL, O’Boyle E, Worthington EL, Forsyth DR. A meta-analysis of intergroup forgiveness. J Posit Psychol 2014; 9(1): 81-95.