Effectiveness of group reality therapy on symptoms of social anxiety, interpretation bias and interpersonal relationships in adolescents

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MS. in clinical psychology, Islamic Azad University, Branch of Neyshabour, Neyshabour, Iran

2 Assistant professor of clinical psychology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Ph.D. in clinical psychology, Tehran Psychiatric Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The present study investigates the effectiveness of group reality therapy on symptoms of social anxiety, interpretation bias and interpersonal relationships in adolescents.
 Materials and Methods: The research population of this clinical research consisted of all students in ninth grade female Sabzevar city in academic year of 2016-2017 that this number based on social anxiety scale score teens, a negative interpretation consequences social and interpersonal relationships in the pre-test were 24 persons who were selected via convenient method and they randomly divided into two groups of experimental and control. The experimental group received group reality therapy and the controls received no treatment. Data analyzed through covariance analysis and SPSS software version 21.
 Results: The results showed that social anxiety scores and interpretation bias and interpersonal relationships in adolescents who participated in the experimental group than in the control group have been replaced teens that had a significant change (P<0.05).
Conclusion: It seems that group reality therapy is effective on social anxiety, interpretation bias and interpersonal relationships in adolescents.

Keywords

References

  1. Neisi A, Shahni M, Farashbandi A. [Examine the relationship between self-esteem, general anxiety, perceived social support, psychological hardiness with social anxiety of female students at first grade secondary schools in Abadan city]. Journal of educational psychology 2005; 12(3): 137-52. (Persian)
  2. Sadock H, Sadock B. [Synopsis of psychiatry]. Tehran: Shahrab; 2007: 247-253. (Persian)  
  3. Anderson RE, Hope DA. The relationship among social phobia, physiological reactivity, and anxiety Sensitivity in an adolescent population. J Anxiety Disord 2009; 23(1): 18-26.
  4. Miers AC, Blote AW, Bogels SM, Wetsenberg DM. Interpretation bias and Social anxiety in adolescents. J Anxiety Disord 2008; 22(8): 1462-71.
  5. Voncken MJ, Bogels SM. Social performance deficits in Social anxiety disorder, Reality during conversation and biased perception during speech. J Anxiety Disord 2008; 22(8): 1384-92.
  6. Beck AT, Emery G, Greenberg RL. Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. 2nd New York: Basic Books; 1985: 245-7.
  7. Sappington A. [Mental Health]. 2nd Tehran: Ravan: 67-75. (Persian)
  8. Karbalayi EH, Ghodsi N, Hoorayi N, Khajehossein H. [Study the effectiveness of life skills training on attitude change in adolescents with disabilities]. Journal of welfare 2006; 12(3): 43-52. (Persian)
  9. Dadashzade H, Yazdandoost R, Gharayi B, Asgharnejadfarid A. [The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy and group exposure therapy on the interpretation bias and fear of negative evaluation in social anxiety disorder]. Iranian journal of psychiatry and psychology 2012; 18(1): 40-51. (Persian)
  10. Clark DM, Wells A. A cognitive model of social anxiety. New York: Guilford; 1995: 69-93.
  11. Khalili TS, Salehi JF, Ansari Z. [Relationship interpretation bias and social anxiety in students]. Iranian journal of psychiatry and clinical psychology 2012; 24(6): 49-58. (Persian)
  12. Stopa L, Clark DM. Social phobia and interpretation of social events. Behav Res Ther 2000; 38: 759-77.
  13. Prochaska J, Norcross, G. [Psychotherapy systems]. Tehran: Ravan; 2010: 443-7. (Persian)
  14. Oladi Z. [Evaluate the effectiveness of group reality therapy to reduce boredom and increase marital satisfaction of married women]. MA. Dissertation. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, College of psychology and education science, 2009: 75-80. (Persian)
  15. Glasser W. [Marriage without failure, reach together and be with each other]. 5th Tehran: Saye Sokhan; 2003: 135-42. (Persian)
  16. Glasser W. [Reality therapy, introduction to the new reality therapy based on choice theory]. Tehran: Saye Sokhan; 2014: 121-5. (Persian)
  17. Shafeeabadi E, Nasari G. [Theories of counseling and guidance]. 8th Tehran: Neshre Daneshghahi; 1999: 11-29. (Persian)
  18. Mousaviasl J. [The training effectiveness of group therapy on self-responsibility and student teacher training center of Hazrat Khadija Zahra University]. MA. Khuzestan: science and research branch of Khuzestan, 2010: 75-80. (Persian)
  19. Alsavalemah A, Alsamadi A. The impact of group reality therapy to reduce stress and anxiety in pregnant women. J Educ Sci Jordan 2012; 8(4): 365-76.
  20. Sheryl P. Using reality therapy to reduce PTSD-related symptoms. J Real Ther 2006; 25(2): 23-31.
  21. Kim J. Effectiveness of reality therapy program for schizophrenic patients. J Korean Acad Nurs 2005; 35(8): 1485-92.
  22. Matthews G, Wells A. [Rumination, depression and metacognition: the S-REF model. In: Papa Georgiou C, Wells A]. UK: Wiley; 2004: 125-51.
  23. Shafeeabadi E, Delavar A, Sedreepoosh N. [Effect of group counseling with reality therapy approach on reducing anxiety among girl teenagers]. Journal of knowledge and research in psychology 2005; 25: 21-34. (Persian)
  24. Esmkhani H, Etemadi A, Nasirnejad F. [Effectiveness of group reality therapy on anxiety in women]. Journal of psychology studies of Al-Zahra University 2014; 10(2): 73-87. (Persian)
  25. Pasha A, Amini S. [Reality therapy impact on life expectancy and anxiety wives of martyrs]. Journal of new findings in psychology 2008; 3(9): 37-50. (Persian) 
  26. Garcia-Lopez LJ, Ingles CJ, Garcia-Fernandz JM, Hidalgo MD, Bermejo R, Puklek M. Psychometric properties and clinical cut-off scores of the Spanish version of the social anxiety scale for adolescents. J Pers Assess 2011; 93(5): 474-82.
  27. Khodaei A, Shokri O, Puklek M, Geranvand F, Tolabi F. [Factor structure and psychometric properties of the social anxiety scale for adolescents (SASA)]. Journal of behavior sciences 2011; 3(5): 209-16. (Persian)
  28. Wilson JK, Rapee RM. The interpretation of negative social events in social phobia: changes during treatment and relationship to outcome. Behav Res Ther 2005; 43: 373-89.
  29. Ostovar S, Razavieh A. [Psychometric characteristics AS-A social anxiety for adolescents for use in Iran. Proceeding of the 5th National Symposium on Child and adolescent mental health]. 2003; October 8; Zanjan, Iran. (Persian)
  30. Barkham M, Hardy GE, Startup M. The IIP-32: A short version of the inventory of interpersonal problems. Br Clin Psychol 1996; 35: 21-35.
  31. Fath N, Azad Fallah P, Rasoolzade TK, Rahimi C. [The validity and reliability of interpersonal problems questionnaire (IIP-32)]. Journal of clinical psychology 2013; 5(3): 69-80. (Persian)
  32. Wubbolding RE, Brickel J. Role play and the art of teaching choice theory, reality therapy and lead management. J Real Ther 2004; 22(2): 57-66.
  33. Purehsan FS, Saed O. Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT) on reduction of social phobia. Proseedia Soc Behav Sci 2010; 5: 1694-7.
  34. Kahnooji R. [Effectiveness of cognitive behavior Family therapy on children with behavioral problems in Divorcing Families city of Zarand in Kerman]. MA. Dissertation. Isfahan: Isfahan University, College of psychology and education science, 2007: 81-86. (Persian)
  35. Dadash Z. [Impact of Reconstruction on the quality of the relationship between Mother-Daughter Relationship. Journal of consultants research 2004; 3(12): 25-38. (Persian)
  36. Jen Derpan P. The effectiveness of structured Satir model groups on family relationships with college students in Taiwan. J FAM Psychol 2000; 25(3): 305-18.
Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 19, Issue 2
March and April 2017
Pages 77-83

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics