Comparing the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on the characteristics of Sternberg's love model in couples

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Department of Counseling and Educational Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Associate professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Tehran Branch, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant professor, Department of Counseling and Educational Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Regarding the importance of the love model in the maintenance of marital relationships, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on the characteristics of Sternberg's love model in couples who referred to counseling centers due to marital problems.
 
Materials and Methods: In the present study, the statistical population included all the couples referred to the welfare counseling and social emergency centers of Torbat-e-Jam city, Iran, in 2021-2022. Using the purposeful and convenient sampling method and based on the score of Sternberg's Love Scale (1986) in the pre-test, 24 couples were selected and randomly replaced into three equal groups of A, B, and C. Group A received CBT, group B received ACT, and group C was the control group. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, multivariate covariance analysis, Tukey post hoc test, and SPSS-22 software.
 
Results: The results showed that both CBT and ACT were effective on scores of Sternberg's Love Scale (P< 0.01), but the effect of ACT was more than CBT in passion and intimacy components (P< 0.05).
 
Conclusion: The results showed that CBT and ACT improved the characteristics of Sternberg's love model, especially ACT was more effective. It is suggested that therapists and couple therapy specialists consider these treatment methods to improve marital relationships.

Keywords

References

  1. Yoo G, Joo S. Love for a marriage story: the association between love and marital satisfaction in middle adulthood. J Child Fam Stud 2022; 31(6): 1570-81.‏
  2. Pleger M, Treppner K, Diefenbacher A, Schade C, Dambacher C, Fydrich T. Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy compared to CBT+: Preliminary results. Eur J Psychiatry 2018; 32(4): 166-73.
  3. Ahangar T, Borjali A, Davaee M. The role of personality traits in premarital counseling and sustainable marriage. Counseling culture and psycotherapy 2023. (In press) (Persian)
  4. Odilavadze M, Panjikidze M, Martskvishvili K, Mestvirishvili M, Kvitsiani M. The role of personality and love style in marital satisfaction: Does similarity matter?. 
    Curr Issues Personal Psychol 2019; 7(4): 288-97.‏
  5. Nel KA, Govender S. The triangular theory of love scale used in a South African context: A research study. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021: 943-54.
  6. Muloko E, Limbu R, Anakaka DL. The difference of the triangular theory of love in married women judging from the length of marriage. Journal of health and behavioral science 2020; 2(4): 264-76.‏
  7. Hashmati Moulaei N. [Investigating the relationship between Sternberg's love and marital satisfaction, with the having goal in life, in married women aged 20-40 in Tehran with Iranian culture]. Proceeding of the first International Conference on Culture, Psychopathology and Education, Tehran, 2017. (Persian)
  8. Solgi Z, Rezaei R, Mirzaei S. [The mediating role of couples' communication patterns in the relationship between love styles and marital commitment]. Family pathology, counseling and enrichment journal 2020; 5(2): 141-60.‏ (Persian)
  9. Clemente M, Gandoy‐Crego M, Bugallo‐Carrera C, Reig‐Botella A, Gomez‐Cantorna C. Types of love as a function of satisfaction and age. Psych J 2020; 9(3): 402-13.‏
  10. Hoesni SM, Kadir NBYA, Sulaiman WSW, Hafidz SWM. Love and marital satisfaction among urban malays: Comparing three groups length of marriage. Jurnal psikologi Malaysia 2016; 30(2): 32-41.
  11. Bodenmann G, Kessler M, Kuhn R, Hocker L, Randall AK. Cognitive-behavioral and emotion-focused couple therapy: Similarities and differences. Clin Psychol Eur 2020; 2(3): e2741.
  12. Dijkstra JM, Nagatsu T. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and Morita therapy (MT); comparison of three established psychotherapies and possible common neural mechanisms of psychotherapies. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2022; 129(5-6): 805-28.
  13. Baucom DH, Fischer MS, Hahlweg K, Epstein NB. Cognitive behavioral couple therapy. In: Fiese BH, Celano M, Deater-Deckard K, Jouriles EN, Whisman MA. (editors). APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Family therapy and training. Washington. D.C.: American Psychological Association; 2019: 257-73.
  14. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy: Towards a unified model of behavior change. World Psychiatry 2019; 18(2): 226.
  15. Truong S, Ward KS, Tracey DK, Gray T. ACT in the outdoors: A program based on acceptance commitment therapy and adventure therapy: Facilitator manual. Research Report, Sydney, Western Sydney University; 2018.
  16. Rahimi A, Amiri H, Afsharriniya K, Arefi M. Comparing the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in the enhancement of marital satisfaction and sexual intimacy in couples referred to counseling centers. Avicenna journal of neuro psycho physiology 2020; 7(2): 126-32.
  17. Shahbazfar R, Zarei E, Haji Alizadeh K, Dortaj F. [Comparison of effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and acceptance commitment therapy approaches in affective-sexual needs. Research in behavioral sciences 2020; 18(3): 403-15. (Persian)
  18. Mousavi Haghighi SE, Pooladi Rishehri A, Mousavi SA. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy and integrated behavioral couples therapy on intimacy and family functioning in divorce-seeking couples. Journal of research and health 2022; 12(3): 167-76.
  19. Sternberg RJ. Construct validation of a triangular love scale. Eur J Soc Psychol 1997; 27: 313-35.

20. Askarpour A, Mohammadipour M. Psychometric properties of Sternberg love scale. Journal of fundamental and applied sciences 2016; 8(Suppl-4): 2036-47.

  1. Esfandiyari Bayat D. [Comparison of the effectiveness of group counselling based on rational, emotional and behavioral therapy (REBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on forgiveness of women affected by marital infidelity]. Journal of psychological science 2021; 20: 139-48. (Persian)
  2. Heidari A, Heidari H, Davoudi H. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment-based therapy on the physical and psychological marital intimacy of women. International journal of educational and psychological researches 2017; 3: 163-7.
  3. Farabi M, Teimouri S, Rajaei A. Comparing the effect of cognitive behavioral couple therapy and integrative behavioral couple therapy on communication patterns in couples with extramarital relationships. International journal of behavioral sciences 2023; 16(4): 241-7.
  4. Durães RSS, Khafif TC, Lotufo-Neto F, Serafim AP. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral couple therapy on reducing depression and anxiety symptoms and increasing dyadic adjustment and marital social skills: An exploratory study. The family journal 2020; 28(4): 344-55.
  5. Yazar R, Tolan Ö. Cognitive-behavioral approach in marital therapy. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar 2021; 13(1): 1-22.‏
Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 26, Issue 1
January and February 2024
Pages 3-8

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics