Predicting bullying at schools based on basic psychological needs, moral identity, and personality traits: The mediating role of social perspective-taking

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. in educational psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

3 Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

4 M.Sc. in educational psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

10.22038/jfmh.2023.23706

Abstract

Introduction: This research aimed to predict bullying in schools based on basic psychological needs, moral identity, and personality traits concerning the mediating role of social perspective-taking.
 
Materials and Methods: The statistical population of this descriptive and correlative study included all secondary high school students of Bahar city- Iran, in the 2020-2021 academic year. The sample size was 390 people selected by the convenient sampling method. The instruments included the scales of Bullying (Illinois, 2001), Basic Psychological Needs (Guardia et al., 2000), Moral Identity (Aquino and Reed, 2002), and the short form of the NEO Personality questionnaire (McCrae and Costa, 1998), and Social Perspective-taking (Mohagheghi et al., 2015). Data were analyzed by path analysis using SPSS-25 and LISREL software.
 
Results: We revealed that the proposed model fits well with the experimental data (GFI= 0.96, IFI= 0.97, CFI= 0.98). Also, social perspective-taking in the relationship between bullying and competency (Z= -2.01, P< 0.05), relationship (Z= -4.61, P< 0.01), moral identity (Z= -5.39, P< 0.01), neuroticism (Z= 2.53, P< 0.05), agreeableness (Z= -5.81, P< 0.01), and conscientiousness (Z= -4.09, P< 0.01) has a significant mediating role.
 
Conclusion: Based on the findings, the lack of satisfaction of basic needs such as competency and communication, weak moral identity, low levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness, high levels of neuroticism, and low social perspective-taking predicts and increases the possibility of bullying in schools by students.

Keywords


  1. Espelage DL, Van Ryzin MJ, Holt MK. Trajectories of bully perpetration across early adolescence: Static risk factors, dynamic covariates, and longitudinal outcomes. Psychol Violence 2018; 8(2): 141.
  2. Wei M, Graber KC. Bullying and physical education: A scoping review. Kinesiol Rev 2023; 12(3): 217-34.
  3. Li H, Qian X, Gong J, Dong H, Chai X, Chao H, et al. Previous school bullying-associated depression in Chinese college students: the mediation of personality. Behav Sci 2022; 13(1): 14.
  4. Stephens MM, Cook-Fasano HT, Sibbaluca K. Childhood bullying: Implications for physicians. Am Fam Physician 2018; 97(3): 187-92.
  5. Husky MM, Delbasty E, Bitfoi A, Carta MG, Goelitz D, Koç C, et al. Bullying involvement and self-reported mental health in elementary school children across Europe. Child Abuse Negl 2020; 107: 104601.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Global School-Based Student Health Survey (GSHS). [cited 2015]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/gshs/index.htm
  7. Mazaheri Tehrani MA, Shiri S, Valipour M. [Studying nature and prevalence of bullying in Zanjan rural secondary schools]. Educational psychology 2015; 11: 17-38. (Persian)
  8. Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. [cited 2019]. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark: /48223/pf0000366483.locale= en
  9. Yan R, Xie R, Jiang M, Li J, Lin X, Ding W. Longitudinal relationship between bullying victimization and depression among left-behind children: roles of negative thoughts and self-compassion. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 852634.
  10. Khalili T, Jafarian Yasar H. [Comparison of stress, depression and anxiety in bully and normal children]. Psychology and behavioral sciences of Iran 2017; 14: 109-15. (Persian)
  11. Mahboob M, Basharpour S, Anbari E. [Causal modeling of bullying-related behaviors based on the experience of child abuse the mediating role of emotional safety]. Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences 2022; 21(4): 402-15. (Persian)
  12. Shirkavand N, Mirhashemi M, Saberi H. [Predicting bullying based on thrill-seeking, school atmosphere, and students' self-concept]. Iranian journal of nursing research 2020; 15(1): 77-85. (Persian)
  13. Abdollāhi Harzand Ā, Mesrābādi J, Farid A. [Distinguishing between bullying and non-bullying students based on cognitive emotion regulation strategies and school connectedness]. Educational innovations 2021; 20(2): 79-94. (Persian)
  14. Fakharyzade Najafabadi S, Rezaei AM, Mohammadyfar MA, Talepasand S. [Logistic regression in predicting bullying based on the components of emotional intelligence and spiritual intelligence]. Journal of educational psychology studies 2023; 20: 115-95. (Persian)
  15. Moradmand M, Ashayeri H, Namvar H. [Predicting adolescent bullying victimization based on attachment to parents and peers, and self-compassion with the mediating role of problem solving]. The journal of new thoughts on education 2023; 19(1): 71-91. (Persian)
  16. Morgan PL, Farkas G, Woods AD, Wang Y, Hillemeier MM, Oh Y. Predictive factors of being bullies or victims of bullies in US elementary schools. School Ment Health 2023; 15(2): 566-82.
  17. Torkashvand M, Keramati H. [Predicting types of bullying based on subscales of moral disengagement and moral identity in elementary school students in Tehran]. Thinking and children 2022; 12(2): 93-110. (Persian)
  18. Jahani Zingir H, Eghbali M. [Prediction of cyberbullying based on impulsivity, moral disengagement and dark personality traits in adolescents with addiction to cyberspace]. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi journal 2023; 12(4): 187-96. (Persian)
  19. Toda HY, Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector auto regressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 1995; 66(1-2): 225-50.
  20. Hooman H. [Structural Equation Modeling using LISREL software]. Tehran: Samat; 2005. (Persian)
  21. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford; 2015.
  22. Espelage DL, Holt MK. Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. J Emot Abuse 2001; 2(2-3): 123-42.
  23. Shahriarfar M. [Normization of the Olveus Bullying Questionnaire]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, 2010. (Persian)
  24. La Guardia JG, Ryan RM, Couchman CE, Deci EL. Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 79(3): 367.
  25. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000; 55(1): 68.
  26. Ghasemipour A, Ghorbani N. [Awareness and basic psychological needs in cardiovascular patients]. Iranian journal of psychiatry and clinical psychology 2010; 16(2): 15. (Persian)
  27. Aquino K, Reed II A. The self-importance of moral identity. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 83(6): 14-23.
  28. Azimpour A, Nissi A, Shahni Yilagh M, Arshadhi N, Beshildeh K. [Validation of the self-importance scale of moral identity for college students]. Personality and individual differences quarterly 2014; 3(4): 19-38. (Persian)
  29. Grossi Farshi M, Mehyar A, Qazi Tabatabai M. [The application of the new Neo personality test and the analysis of its characteristics and factor structure among Iranian university students]. Al-Zahra humanities journal 2001; 11: 173-89. (Persian)
  30. Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. Reply to Eysenck. Pers Individ Dif 1992; 13(8): 861-5.
  31. Mohaghegi H, Zoghi Paidar MR, Yaghoobi A, Yarmohammadi Vasel M, Mohammadzadeh S. [Codification and validation of a scale to measure social perspective-taking]. Social cognition 2016; 5(1): 20-34. (Persian)