The effect of early maladaptive schemas on communication styles of romantic couples

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Social Sciences Institute, Department of Public Relations and Publicity, Interpersonal Communication Master's Program, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

2 Department of Public Relations and Publicity, Department of Interpersonal Communication, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

10.22038/jfmh.2023.23590

Abstract

Introduction: Communication in romantic relationships can be defined as the verbal or nonverbal communication of the partners' feelings and thoughts to each other. One factor affecting this interaction process is whether or not individuals in a romantic relationship have a schema. Schemas can be defined as the pattern thinking or point of view an individual has about him/herself, his/her environment and the outside world. These thoughts are often thoughts that are difficult to change. This study examined the effect of early maladaptive schemas on the communication styles of individuals who have been in a relationship for at least one year.
Materials and Methods: Mixed design was used in this study in İzmir, Turkey. In the quantitative part of the study, the Young Schema Scale Short Form-3 was applied to 151 participants. In the qualitative part, interview questions were asked to 10 participants selected by purposive sampling technique. The data were analyzed through content analysis, t-test, and SPSS software.
Results: It was found that participants who scored high and low in early maladaptive schema domains followed different strategies in terms of communication style, emotion sharing, opinion differences, and self-disclosure themes.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, early maladaptive schemas have a negative impact on interpersonal communication among couples.

Keywords

References

  1. Osher D, Cantor P, Berg J, Steyer L, Rose T. Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development. Appl Dev Sci 2020; 24(1): 6-36.
  2. Bowlby J. The making and breaking of affectional bonds: II. Some principles of psychotherapy: The Fiftieth Maudsley Lecture (expanded version). Br J Psychiatry 1977; 130(5): 421-31.
  3. Thompson RA, Simpson JA, Berlin LJ. Taking perspective on attachment theory and research: Nine fundamental questions. Attach Hum Dev 2022; 24(5): 543-60.
  4. Beck AT. Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper and Row; 1967.
  5. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. New Jersey: Guilford; 2003.
  6. Cohen TF, Strong B. The marriage and family experience: Intimate relationships in a changing society. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2020.
  7. Carmichael CL, Mizrahi M. Connecting cues: The role of nonverbal cues in perceived responsiveness. Curr Opin Psychol 2023; 53: 101663.
  8. Watzlawick P, Beavin J. Some formal aspects of communication. Am Behav Sci 1967; 10(8): 4-8.
  9. Pareek S, Kaur T. Self-disclosure: How much is adequate for marital satisfaction? A literature review. IAHRW international journal of social sciences review 2018; 6(7): 1469-74.
  10. Smith JA, Johnson RB. Emotion sharing and its impact on relationship satisfaction: A systematic review. J Relationsh Res 2020; 15(3): 245-61.
  11. Smith KL, Jones MP. Conflict dynamics, conflict resolution strategies, and relationship satisfaction in romantic partnerships. J Fam Psychol 2019; 33(4): 456-67.
  12. Bach B, Lockwood G, Young JE. A new look at the schema therapy model: organization and role of early maladaptive schemas. Cogn Behav Ther 2018; 47(4): 328-49.
  13. Soygüt G, Karaosmanoğlu A, Cakir Z. Assessment of early maladaptive schemas: A psychometric study of the Turkish Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form-3. Turk J Psychiatry 2009; 20(1): 75-84.
  14. Thimm JC. Early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems: A circumplex analysis of the YSQ-SF. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther 2013; 13(1): 113-24.
  15. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. [Schemagerichte therapie]. Holland, De Molenzoom kantorenpark: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2016. (Dutch)
  16. Roediger E. [Schema therapy for personality disorders. A critical review]. Nervenarzt 2015; 86(1): 60-71. (German)
  17. Shekari Ghandpazi F, Navabinejad S, Delavar A. Predicting the family function based on early maladaptive schemas and couples' communication patterns (Case study: education). Iranian journal of educational sociology 2020; 3(2): 62-9.
  18. Falehkar A, Bordan Z, Kosha MD, Amani O, Moghadamfar N. [The relationship between self-differentiation and early maladaptive schemas with marital satisfaction of divorced women]. Iranian journal of nursing research 2020; 14(6): 27-34. (Persian)
  19. Janovsky T, Clark GI, Rock AJ. Trait mindfulness mediates the relationship between early maladaptive schema and interpersonal problems. Aust Psychol 2019; 54(5): 391-401.
  20. Fernández-González L, Orue I, Adrián L, Calvete E. Child-to-parent aggression and dating violence: Longitudinal associations and the predictive role of early maladaptive schemas. J Fam Violence 2022; 37: 181-9.
  21. Ertürk Sİ, Kahya Y, Gör N. Childhood emotional maltreatment and aggression: The mediator role of the early maladaptive schema domains and difficulties in emotion regulation. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 2020; 29(1): 92-110. 

22.Gündoğmuş AG, Doğan Bulut S, Koçyiğit Y, Şafak Y, Welkin Haksar L. The relationships between intimate partner violence and attachment, personality features, and early maladaptive schemas. Turk J Clin Psychiatry 2023; 26(2): 91-103.

Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 25, Issue 6
November and December 2023
Pages 353-362

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics