Validation of the Persian version of the Ward Atmosphere Scale

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Nursing and Midwifery School, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

2 M.Sc, Instructor, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

3 Associate professor, Nursing and Midwifery School, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Assessing the characteristics of the atmosphere of psychiatric wards provides managers with valuable information. This tool has had different accreditation features in different countries. This study was conducted to validate the Persian version of the short form of the psychiatry Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS).
 
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was part of a wider research (181 nurses and 299 patients) in selected hospitals of Bushehr and Shiraz cities-Iran in 2019. The psychiatry WAS-short form was validated according to the collected data. The steps of translation and re-translation of the scale were done by two people fluent in Farsi and English. Form validity and content validity were checked by asking the opinions of 11 experts, and the reliability of the questionnaire was checked by determining internal consistency and stability. SPSS software version 22 was used for data analysis.
 
Results: No items were removed during content validity. The average index and content validity ratio were 0.92 and 0.88, respectively. The Kuder-Richardson coefficient was calculated for nurses and patients, respectively, 0.92 and 0.86. The intracluster correlation between test and retest scores for nurses and patients was calculated as 0.91 and 0.89, respectively.
 
Conclusion: Considering the validity and reliability of the short form of the psychiatry ward atmosphere scale in Iranian society, it is recommended to be used by researchers and medical staff. Other methods, such as divergent validity and factor analysis of the questions of the revised Iranian version of the questionnaire, are suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. Fröhlich D, Rabenschlag F, Schoppmann S, Borgwardt S, Lang UE, Huber CG. Positive effects of an anti-aggression and de-escalation training on ward atmosphere and subjective safety may depend on previous training experience. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9: 134-8.
  2. Baumgardt J, Jäckel D, Helber-Böhlen H, Morgenstern K, Voigt A, Schöppe E, et al. Making psychiatric wards more peaceful places: Evaluating the implementation of the safewards model in acute psychiatry using a pre-post mixed-method study design. California: Sage; 2020.
  3. Weltens I, Drukker M, van Amelsvoort T, Bak M. Staff and ward factors associated with aggression development on an acute closed psychiatric ward: an experience sampling method study. BMJ Open 2023; 13(2): e067943.
  4. Dickens GL, Johnson A, Steel K, Everett B, Tonkin M. Interventions to improve social climate in acute mental health inpatient settings: Systematic review of content and outcomes. SAGE Open Nurs 2022; 8: 23779608221124291.
  5. Schröder A, Lundqvist LO. The quality in psychiatric care-inpatient staff instrument: A psychometric evaluation. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10(7): 1213. 
  6. Corbetta M, Corso B, Camuccio CA. Rules and ward climate in acute psychiatric setting: Comparison of staff and patient perceptions. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2022; 31(3): 611-24.
  7. Belsiyal CX, Rentala S, Das A. Use of therapeutic milieu interventions in a psychiatric setting: A systematic review. J Educ Health Promot 2022; 11: 234. 
  8. Weltens I, Bak M, Verhagen S, Vandenberk E, Domen P, van Amelsvoort T, et al. Aggression on the psychiatric ward: Prevalence and risk factors. A systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2021; 16(10): e0258346.
  9. Tomlin J, Tonkin M. The EssenCES measure of ward atmosphere: Mokken scaling, confirmatory factor analysis, and investigating patient-level characteristics. Int J Forensic Ment Health 2023; 22(3): 199-209.
  10. Vahidi M, Namdar Areshtanab H, Ebrahimi H, Asghari Jafarabadi M. Development of “The Safe Psychiatric Ward Battery”. Clin Nurs Res. 2023; 32(2): 375-83.
  11. Alexiou E, Degl'Innocenti A, Kullgren A, Wijk H. The impact of facility relocation on patients' perceptions of ward atmosphere and quality of received forensic psychiatric care. J Forensic Leg Med 2016; 42: 1-7.
  12. Efkemann SA, Bernard J, Kalagi J, Otte I, Ueberberg B, Assion H-J, et al. Ward atmosphere and patient satisfaction in psychiatric hospitals with different ward settings and door policies. Results from a mixed methods study. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10: 576-87.
  13. Wann-Hansson C, Eklund M. A revised Swedish version of the Ward Atmosphere Scale: Usability and psychometrics. Nord J Psychiatry 2010; 64(5): 303-9.
  14. Sørlie T, Parniakov A, Rezvy G, Ponomarev O. Psychometric evaluation of the Ward Atmosphere Scale in a Russian psychiatric hospital. Nord J Psychiatry 2010; 64(6): 377-83.
  15. Banks C, Priebe S. Scales for assessing the therapeutic milieu in psychiatric inpatient settings: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2020;66:44-50.
  16. Deodato J. Evaluating web-scale discovery services: A step-by-step guide. Information technology and libraries 2015; 34(2): 19-75.
  17. Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in medicine journal 2019; 11(2): 49-54.
  18. Betschart P, Staubli SE, Zumstein V, Babst C, Sauter R, Schmid H-P, et al. Improving patient education materials: A practical algorithm from development to validation. Curr Urol 2019; 13(2): 64-9.
  19. Taghizadeh Z, Ebadi A, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, Bagherzadeh R. [Psychometric properties of health related measures. Part 1: Translation, development, and content and face validity]. Payesh (Health monitor) 2017; 16(3): 343-57. (Persian)
  20. Shrotryia VK, Dhanda U. Content validity of assessment instrument for employee engagement. SAGE Open 2019; 9(1): 2158244018821751.
  21. Bujang MA, Baharum N. A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: A review. Archives of orofacial science 2017; 12(1): 1-11.
  22. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15(2): 155-63.
  23. Røssberg JI, Friis S. A suggested revision of the Ward Atmosphere Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003; 108(5): 374-80.
  24. Bakken TL, Røssberg JI, Friis S. The ward atmosphere scale for psychiatric inpatients with intellectual disability: A pilot study. Adv Ment HealthIntellect Disabil 2012; 6(5): 265-72.
Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 25, Issue 5
September and October 2023
Pages 335-343

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics