Predicting moral behavior based on psychological well-being and attitude to time: The mediating role of the self-transcendence and fundamental values

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. in educational psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

2 Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to predict moral behavior based on psychological well-being and attitude to time, considering the mediating role of self-transcendence and fundamental values.
 
Materials and Methods: The statistical population of this descriptive and correlational study consisted of all students of Bu-Ali Sina University in Hamadan-Iran in the 2018-2019 academic year. The sample size was 372 students selected by the convenient sampling method. The instruments included Psychological Well-being (Diener et al., 1985), Attitude to Time (Mello and Worrell, 2010), Self-transcendence (Levinson et al., 2005), Researcher-Made Scale of Moral Behavior, and Fundamental Values Scale (Jason et al., 2001). Data were analyzed by path analysis using SPSS-25 and LISREL.
 
Results: The results indicated that the proposed model has a good fitness with the empirical data (GFI= 0.95, IFI= 0.98, CFI= 0.95). The results showed that self-transcendence and fundamental values significantly mediate the relationship between moral behavior, psychological well-being, and attitude to time (P< 0.01). Attitude to time and psychological well-being significantly affect moral behavior by mediating self-transcendence and fundamental values.
 
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this research, the probability of performing moral behavior by people with psychological well-being and positive attitude to time can be predicted when people have fundamental values and gain knowledge about them. It is also necessary that these people have reached a level of self-transcendence. Value and self-transcendence connect moral behavior with psychological well-being and attitude to time and facilitate the possibility of moral behavior in social situations.

Keywords


  1. Ellemers N, Van Der Toorn J, Paunov Y, Van Leeuwen T. The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2019; 23(4): 332-66.
  2. He P, Jiang C, Xu Z, Shen C. Knowledge hiding: current research status and future research directions. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 748237.
  3. He P, Shen C, Zhao H, Jiang C. Editorial: Moral emotion, moral cognition, and (im) moral behavior in the workplace. Front Psychol 2023; 14: 1232652.
  4. Farhadi M, Delfan Beiranvand A. Designing a model for predicting moral behavior based on parenting styles and ego strength: The mediating role of the self-transcendence structure. Journal of fundamentals of mental health 2023; 25(1): 17-26.
  5. Mohagheghi M, Farhadi M, Rashid KH, Delfan Beiranvand A. Predicting moral behavior based on moral intelligence and personality traits: The mediating role of the structure self-transcendence. Journal of fundamentals of mental health 2021; 23(4): 273-84.
  6. Delfan Beiranvand A, Rashid K, Yaghoobi A, Kordnoghabi R. [Predictors of adolescents' moral behavior based on moral attitude, moral identity, benefit and cost]. Journal of psychological sciences 2023; 21(119): 2145-63. (Persian)
  7. Delfan Beiranvand A, Rashid Kh, Yaghoubi A, Kordnoghabi R. Facilitating and preventing factors in moral and immoral behaviors based on the implicit theories of the Iranian people: The role of benefit and costs. Journal of fundamentals of mental health 2022; 24(3): 195-212.
  8. Delfan Beiranvand A, Rashid K. [Development, validation, reliability and normalization of benefit and cost scales: As a factor to explain why moral Behaviors are performed or not performed in various life situations]. Moral reflections 2022; 3(3): 115-49. (Persian)
  9. Delfan Beiranvand A, Rashid K. [Developing, validation, reliability and normalization of Moral Attitude Scale among adolescents]. Psychological methods and models 2022; 13: 71-92. (Persian)
  10. Delfan Beiranvand A, Bayat A. [The relationship between moral behavior and identity: Mediating role of psychological and situational benefit]. Journal of transcendent education 2022; 2(1): 35-47. (Persian)
  11. Delfan Beiranvand A, Bayat A. [The mediating role of perception of social interaction in the relationship between moral behavior and identity dimensions among students]. Education 2022; 2(2): 17-30. (Persian)
  12. Delfan Beiranvand A, Bayat A. The relationship between moral behavior and happiness: Mediating role of basic psychological needs. Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Educational Psychology Psychoeducational Interventions, 2022.
  13. Dhanabhakyam M, Sarath M. Psychological wellbeing: A systematic literature review. International journal of advanced research in science, communication and technology 2023; 3(1): 603-7.
  14. Anagnostopoulos F, Griva F. Exploring time perspective in Greek young adults: Validation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and relationships with mental health indicators. Soc Indic Res 2012; 106: 41-59.
  15. Mello ZR, Worrell FC. The adolescent time inventory: Preliminary technical manual. Berkeley: Colorado Springs, CO; 2010.
  16. Oyserman D. Psychology of values. In: Wright JD. (editor). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. 2nd Oxford: Elsevier; 2015: 36-40.
  17. Jason LA, Reichler A, King C, Derryk M, Camacho J, Marchese W. The measurement of wisdom: A preliminary effort. J Community Psychol 2001; 29: 585-98.
  18. Worth P, Smith MD. Clearing the pathways to self-transcendence. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 648381.
  19. Mitchell MS, Reynolds SJ, Treviño LK. The study of behavioral ethics within organizations: A special issue introduction. Pers Psychol 2020; 73(1): 5-17.
  20. Hidayah R. Students’ self-adjustment, self-control, and morality. Journal of social studies education research 2021; 12(1): 174-93.
  21. Ellemers N, van Nunspeet F. Neuroscience and the social origins of moral behavior: How neural underpinnings of social categorization and conformity affect every day moral and immoral behavior. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2020; 29(5): 513-20.
  22. Hendy NT, Montargot N. Understanding academic dishonesty among business school students in France using the theory of planned behavior. The international journal of management education 2019; 17(1): 85-93.
  23. Rimkus LK. A new measure of counterproductive student behavior. East Carolina: East Carolina University; 2012.
  24. Kannan KV. Moral and spiritual intelligence in young gifted and talented students in New Zealand: A teacher perspective. Proceeding of the National Gifted and Talented Conference. Wellington, New Zealand, 2006.
  25. Toda HY, Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector auto regressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 1995; 66(1-2): 225-50.
  26. Hooman H. [Structural equation modeling using LISREL software]. Tehran: Samat; 2005. (Persian)
  27. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Guilford; 2015: 3.
  28. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HE. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 1999; 125: 276-302.
  29. Bayani AA, Koocheky AM, Goodarzi H. [The reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale]. Iranian psychologists 2007; 3: 259-65. (Persian)
  30. Bakhshipour R, Dezhkam [A confirmatory factor analysis of the positive affect and negative affect scales (PANAS)]. Journal of psychology 2006; 9(4): 351-65. (Persian)
  31. Rashid Kh, Alizadeh G, Moradi A. [Investigating the relationship between happiness and psychological well-being with attitude to time in students of Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan]. Clinical psychology and personality 2017; 15(2): 179-88. (Persian)
  32. Levenson M, Jenninges PA, Aldwin CM, Shiraishi RW. Self-transcendence: conceptualization and measurement. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2005; 60(2): 127-43.
  33. Kordnoghabi R. [Psychology of wisdom]. Tehran: Arjmand; 2019. (Persian)
  34. Kordnoghabi R, Jahan F, Rashid Kh, Rezaei A. [Measuring wisdom in Iran (introduction and validation of three instruments)]. Educational measurement 2015; 6: 187-212. (Persian)
  35. Rezayi Z, Hejazi E, Kareshki H. [The moderating role of empathy in the relationship between moral judgment and moral behavior]. Journal of psychology 2020; 24(2): 167-83. (Persian)
  36. Naeimi Nezamabad M, Vazifehdust H, Abdolvand MA, Khodayari B. [Investigating the role of personality traits and psychological well-being on individuals' moral behavior]. Razi journal of medical sciences 2021; 28(5): 72-9. (Persian)