Investigating the factor structure and validation of the electronic form of the Family Togetherness Scale (FTS) in university students during the corona crisis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

2 Assistant professor of psychology, Young Researchers and Elite Club, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

3 Associate professor of psychology, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus outbreak has affected the use of printed forms tools, so validating the family functioning scale online can help solve problems in this area; therefore, this study aimed to validate the electronic form of the Family Togetherness Scale (FTS).
 
Materials and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted using a psychometric method. The statistical population consisted of all students of the Islamic Azad University of Tehran in 2020. The number of samples was determined based on psychometric criteria to 100 people for the convergent validity section and 695 for the construct validity section. The students were selected through cluster sampling method. Research data were collected through Family Togetherness Scale (FTS) and Family Assessment Device (FAD) in printed and electronic form by sending a questionnaire link to the participants' mobile phones. To examine the validity of the scale, content, concurrent, convergent, divergent, and factor analysis methods were used. We investigated its reliability using internal consistency and split-half reliability methods.
 
Results: The findings of exploratory factor analysis showed that the electronic form of the Family Functioning Scale consists of five factors and has appropriate validity and reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis also confirmed the five-factor model. This questionnaire was performed along with the Family Assessment Questionnaire. The results indicated the positive significant correlation between two scales (r= 0.67; P< 0.001).
 
Conclusion: Based on the results, Family Togetherness Scale (FTS) can be used to assess family functioning in Iranian populations.

Keywords

References

  1. Xie S, Wu D, Liang L. Family environment profile in China and its relation to family structure and young children’s social competence. Early Educ Dev 2022; 33(3): 469-89.
  2. Blackwell AH, Asghar K, de Dieu Hategekimana J, Roth D, O’Connor M, Falb K. Family functioning in humanitarian contexts: Correlates of the Feminist-Grounded Family Functioning Scale among men and women in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. J Child Fam Stud 2023; 32: 197–210.
  3. Brickell TA, French LM, Sullivan JK, Varbedian NV, Wright MM, Lange RT. Unhealthy family functioning is associated with health-related quality of life among military spouse caregivers. Psychol Trauma 2022; 14(4): 587.
  4. Zhang H, Han T, Ma S, Qu G, Zhao T, Ding X, et al. Association of child maltreatment and bullying victimization among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of family function, resilience, and anxiety. J Affect Disord 2022; 299: 12-21.
  5. Erickson SJ, Dinces S, Kubinec N, Annett RD. Pediatric cancer survivorship: Impact upon hair cortisol concentration and family functioning. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2022; 29(4): 943-53.
  6. Mohanty J, Chokkanathan S, Alberton AM. COVID‐19–related stressors, family functioning and mental health in Canada: Test of indirect effects. Fam Relat 2022; 71(2): 445-62.
  7. Brantley E, Darden M, Ku L. Associations of expanding parental medicaid eligibility and parental health and family functioning. Acad Pediatr 2022; 22(4): 622-30.
  8. Pu DF, Rodriguez CM. Child and parent factors predictive of mothers’ and fathers’ perceived family functioning. J Fam Psychol 2023; 37(1): 121-31.
  9. Mikolajczak M, Raes M-E, Avalosse H, Roskam I. Exhausted parents: Sociodemographic, child-related, parent-related, parenting and family-functioning correlates of parental burnout. Key topics in parenting and behavior. Berlin: Springer; 2022: 57-69.
  10. Russ SA, Hotez E, Berghaus M, Hoover C, Verbiest S, Schor EL, et al. Building a life course intervention research framework. Pediatrics 2022; 149(Suppl 5): e2021053509E.
  11. Turanovic JJ. Exposure to violence and victimization: Reflections on 25 years of research from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. J Adolesc Health 2022; 71(6): S14-S23.
  12. Kelley AN, Curtis MG, Wieling E. Expanding the traumatic stress framework to incorporate a socioecological family systems perspective. Fam Process 2022; 61(2): 476-89.
  13. Randerson K. Conceptualizing family business social responsibility. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2022; 174: 121225.
  14. Nodira T, Rashid X. Problems of innovation management in the higher education system. Web of scientist: International scientific research journal 2022; 3(11): 155-64.
  15. Fischer H-TM. The impact of natural hazard-induced disasters on family systems: A meta-ethnography: Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; 2022.
  16. Gallo Garcia C. Be the change that you want to see in the world: A moral economy of volunteering for female empowerment in Brazil. Womens Stud 2023; 52(1): 61-78.
  17. Yarmohamadian A, Mokhtari E. [The relation between family function and coping styles with stressful situations among female students of Isfahan University in 2013]. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences 2015; 14(9): 713-28. (Perisian)
  18. Kahrazee F, Rigi Kooteh B. [Relationship between the family function with academic self-regulation among the nursing students]. Bimonthly of education strategies in medical sciences 2016; 9(3): 186-93. (Persian)
  19. Hosseini FS, Fereshte M. [Relationship between family function with use of social networks in high school students]. Journal of applied psychological research 2016; 7(2): 153-65. (Persian)
  20. Ramaswami SB, Jensen T, Berghaus M, De-Oliveira S, Russ SA, Weiss-Laxer N, et al. Family health development in life course research: A scoping review of family functioning measures. Pediatrics 2022; 149(Suppl 5): e2021053509J.
  21. Puffer ES, Giusto A, Rieder AD, Friis-Healy E, Ayuku D, Green EP. Development of the Family Togetherness Scale: A mixed-methods validation study in Kenya. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 662991.
  22. Yuan C, Yong G, Wang X, Xie T, Wang C, Yuan Y, et al. Developing the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 for a greater impact on the quality of life of patients with functional dyspepsia compared to Somatic Symptom Scale-8. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20(1): 359.
  23. Hosseini Nasab A, Sanjari S, Mohammadi Soleimani MR, Alidousti K. An investigation into the effects of COVID-19 vaccines on Iranian women’s menstrual cycle. Ital J Gynæcol Obstet 2023. (in press)
  24. Sanjari S. [Relationship between self-concept, resilience and differentiation with Corona virus anxiety in hospital intensive care unit nurses]. Journal of critical care nursing 2022; 15(1): 1-21. (Persian)
  25. Sanjari S, AmirFakhraei A, Mohammidi Soliemani MR, Alidousti K. Validation of the Slade Fear of Childbirth Scale for Pregnancy in a sample of Iranian women: A cross-sectional study. Crescent journal of medical and biological sciences 2022; 9(3): 138-46.
  26. Sanjari S, Soleimani MRM. Validation of the Persian version of the Engagement in E-Learning Scale in students of the School of Nursing and Midwifery in Iran. Middle East journal of rehabilitation and health studies 2023; 10(3): e134881
  27. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital Fam Ther 1983; 9(2): 171-80.
  28. Pourmovahed Z, Pourmovahed Z, Zareymahmoodabadi H. [Effect of Family-centered care on family function of preterm newborns hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)]. Nursing and midwifery journal 2021; 19(10): 773-82. (Persian)
  29. Beierlein V, Bultmann JC, Möller B, von Klitzing K, Flechtner H-H, Resch F, et al. Measuring family functioning in families with parental cancer: Reliability and validity of the German adaptation of the Family Assessment Device (FAD). J Psychosom Res 2017; 93: 110-17.
  30. Kabacoff RI, Miller IW, Bishop DS, Epstein NB, Keitner GI. A psychometric study of the McMaster Family Assessment Device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples. J Fam Psychol 1990; 3: 431-9.
  31. Yousefi N. [An investigation of the psychometric properties of the McMaster Clinical Rating Scale (MCRS)]. Educational measurement 2012; 2(7): 91-120. (Persian)
  32. Fenn J, Tan C-S, George S. Development, validation and translation of psychological tests. BJPsych Adv 2020; 26(5): 306-15.
  33. Pritchett R, Kemp J, Wilson P, Minnis H, Bryce G, Gillberg C. Quick, simple measures of family relationships for use in clinical practice and research. A systematic review. Fam Pract 2010; 28(2): 172-87.
  34. Acal C, Aguilera A, Escabias M. New modeling approaches based on varimax rotation of functional principal components. Mathematics 2020; 8: 2085.
  35. Sanjari S, Soleimani MRM, Keramat A. Development and validation of an electronic scale for sexual violence experiences in Iranian women. Crescent journal of medical and biological sciences 2023; 10(1): 27-35.
  36. Torabi B, Amirfakhrae A, Rezaei Gazaki P, Mohammadi Soleimani MR. [Investigation of factor structure and validation of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale in working children in the corona crisis: A descriptive study]. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences 2022; 21(2): 149-64. (Persian)
  37. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 2006; 28(1): 563-75.
  38. Sanjari S, Mohammadi Soleimani MR. Validation of the Knowledge Sharing Behavior Scale among nursing and midwifery faculty members in Iran: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation. Middle East journal of rehabilitation and health studies 2023; 11(1): e134886.
  39. Klever P. The Nuclear Family Functioning Scale: Initial development and preliminary validation. Fam Syst Health 2001; 19(4): 397.
  40. Falceto O, Busnello E, Bozzetti M. Validation of diagnostic scales of family functioning for use in primary health care services. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2000; 7(4): 255-63.
  41. Mejia A, Filus A, Calam R, Morawska A, Sanders MR. Measuring parenting practices and family functioning with brief and simple instruments: Validation of the Spanish version of the PAFAS. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2015; 46(3): 426-37.
  42. Goodrich KM, Gilbride DD. The refinement and validation of a model of family functioning after child's disclosure as lesbian, gay, or bisexual. J LGBT Issues Couns 2010; 4(2): 92-121.
  43. Lavorgna L, Di Tella M, Miele G, De Mercanti SF, Streito LM, Perutelli V, et al. Online validation of a battery of questionnaires for the assessment of family functioning and related factors. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 771.
  44. Shamali M, Shahriari M, Konradsen H, Akbari M, Afshari Z, Abbasinia M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Family Functioning, Health, and Social Support Questionnaire (FAFHES) in a sample of heart failure patients and their family members. J Nurs Meas 2023; 31(1): 30-43.
  45. Brinckley M-M, Jones R, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Lovett R. The development and validation of a family functioning measure for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults. BMC Public Health 2022; 22(1): 1-11.
  46. Williams V, François C, Danchenko N, Nelson L, Williams N, Yarr S, et al. Psychometric validation of the depression and family functioning scale. Curr Med Res Opin 2016; 32(4): 639-50.
  47. Aspur-León G, Pandia-Pacori J, Aleman-Ccacya X, Calizaya-López J. Validation of the family functioning style scale to assess family strengths against the Covid-19. Neuroquantology 2022; 20(7): 2750-9.
Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 25, Issue 4
July and August 2023
Pages 253-262

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics