Facilitating and preventing factors in moral and immoral behaviors based on the implicit theories of the Iranian people: The role of benefit and costs

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student in educational psychology, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

2 Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: In the present study, the factors that facilitate and prevent moral and immoral behaviors were examined according to the role of benefits and costs of each of these behaviors.
 
Materials and Methods: This study was phenomenological qualitative research. Structured interviews were used to collect data. Then, the information obtained from the interview was analyzed by explicit content analysis method during three stages of the process of implementation open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Participants in the study included 222 people (121 high school students aged 16 to 19 years and 101 adults aged 20 to 52 years) from Khuzestan, Lorestan, Hamadan, Mazandaran, Tehran, Arak, Fars, Isfahan, Khorasan Razavi, Ilam, Kermanshah, and Kurdistan provinces that were selected using the convenient sampling method.
 
Results: The results of the content analysis of the interviews showed that according to the implicit theories of the Iranian people, the benefits factor (psychological benefit and situational benefit) has an important role in facilitating and preventing the performance of any moral and immoral behaviors. Based on the findings, it can be said that the benefit factor (psychological-situational) and cost (psychological-situational) play important roles in the likelihood of the formation, occurrence, and inhibition of moral and immoral behaviors by preventing them in various work, study, social, and life situations.
 
Conclusion: Overall, the research findings give new insights into the role of benefit and cost as factors that control the occurrence or non-occurrence of moral and immoral behaviors in various situations.
 

Keywords

References

  1. Gray K, Graham J. Atlas of moral psychology. New York: Guilford; 2018.
  2. Sunar D. The psychology of morality. Online Readings on Psychology and Culture 2(1). [cited 2018]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1012.
  3. Ropiak DJ. Commentary on ethics and morality. Lane T. (editor). 2019. Available form: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dariusz_Ropiak3/publication/279685427_Commentary_on_Ethics_and_Morality/links/5dbc23f9a6fdcc2128f6bd29/Commentary-on-Ethics-and-Morality
  4. Ellemers N. Morality and the regulation of social behavior: Groups as moral anchors. East Sussex, United Kingdom: Psychology Press; 2017: 14.
  5. Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Treviño LK. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. J Appl Psychol 2010; 95(1): 1.
  6. Tonus H, Oruç İ. Unethical behaviors and their management in human resource management: A content analysis of a company's personnel regulation. J Bus Ethics 2012; 5(10): 173-81.
  7. Kaptein M. Understanding unethical behavior by unraveling ethical culture. Hum Relat 2011; 64(6): 843-69.
  8. Eisenberg N. Empathy related responding link with self-regulation, moral judgment and moral behavior. Herzliy a Symposium Forgiveness and Self-Forgiving 2001; 4(2): 107-26.
  9. Rai TS, Holyoak KJ. Exposure to moral relativism compromises moral behavior. J Exp Soc Psychol 2013; 49 (6): 995-1001.
  10. Treviño LK, Den Nieuwenboer NA, Kish-Gephart JJ. (UN) Ethical behavior in organizations. Annu Rev Psychol 2014; 65: 635-60.
  11. Varghese B, Mano Raj DS. Psycho-Social determinants of morality: A comprehensive review of the factors of moral information processing. The international journal of humanities and social studies 2014; 2(5): 131-5.
  12. Heinrichs K, Oser F, Lovat T. Handbook of moral motivation: Theories, models, applications. 2013.
  13. Cheng C. The predictive effects of self-esteem, moral self, and moral reasoning on delinquent behaviors of Hong Kong young people. Int J Criminol Sociol 2014; 3: 133-45.
  14. Batson CD, Thompson ER. Why don't moral people act morally? Motivational considerations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2001; 10(2): 54-7.
  15. Treviño LK, Weaver GR, Reynolds SJ. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. J management 2006; 32(6):951-90.
  16. Hardy SA, Bean DS, Olsen JA. Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors: Interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation. J Youth Adolesc 2015; 44(8): 1542-54.
  17. Trevino LK, Youngblood SA. Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. J Appl Psychol 1990; 75(4): 378.
  18. Blasi A. Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychol Bull 1980;
    88(1): 1.
  19. Damon W, Colby A. Education and moral commitment. J Moral Educ 1996; 25(1): 31-7.
  20. Weber J, Gillespie J. Differences in ethical beliefs, intentions, and behaviors: The role of beliefs and intentions in ethics research revisited. Bus Soc 1998; 37(4): 447-67.
  21. Shabani Z. [Meta-analysis of moral development in research conducted during the years 2007-2009]. Biannual journal of University Textbooks; Research and Writting2012; 16: 42-81. (Persian)
  22. Gino F. Understanding ordinary unethical behavior: Why people who value morality act immorally. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2015; 3: 107-11.
  23. Weitz E, Vardi YO. Understanding and managing misbehavior in organizations. 21st Century Management: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008.
  24. Narayanan J, Ronson S, Pillutla MM. Groups as enablers of unethical behavior: The role of cohesion on group member actions. In Ethics in groups. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2006.
  25. Lowry R, Peterson M. Cost-benefit analysis and non-utilitarian ethics. Polit Philos Econ 2012; 11(3): 258-79.
  26. Bennis WM, Medin DL, Bartels DM. The costs and benefits of calculation and moral rules. Perspect Psychol Sci 2010; 5(2): 187-202.
  27. Zerbe RO. The consent justification for benefit-cost analysis. J Benefit Cost Anal 2020; 11(2): 31940.
  28. Kosovich JJ, Hulleman CS, Barron KE, Getty S. A practical measure of student motivation: Establishing validity evidence for the expectancy-value-cost scale in middle school. J Early Adolesc 2015; 35: 790-816.
  29. Eggen PD, Kauchak DP. Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. 8th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2019.
  30. Wigfield A, Cambria J. Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In the decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2010.
  31. Grady MP. Qualitative and action research: A practitioner handbook. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation; 1998.
  32. Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI. Wisdom and creativity. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW. (editors). Handbook of the psychology of aging. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2001:500-22.
Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 24, Issue 3
May and June 2022
Pages 195-212

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics