The mediating role of trust and security in the relationship between differentiation and marital intimacy in non-clinical married women

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A. Department of Education and Counseling Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. Iran

2 Associate professor. Department of Education and Counseling Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the mediating role of trust and security in the relationship of differentiation with marital intimacy in women.
Materials and Methods: The statistical population of this descriptive-correlational study consisted of all non-clinical married women living in Mashhad in 2018 who were selected by the convenient sampling method and according to Morgan table, 400 persons were selected. Data were collected using Bagarozzi Intimacy Questionnaire (2001), the Self-Differentiation Questionnaire of Scorone and Dundee (1998), the Gutman Trust Questionnaire (2012), and the Maslow Psychological Security Questionnaire (2004). After data collection, descriptive statistics, structural equation method along with regression and Pearson test and AMOS 24 and SPSS software were used to analyze the data.
Results: The results of structural equation analysis showed that the proposed model fits the data (GFI= 0.83, RMSEA= 0.04). Also the results of regression analysis showed that trust and security had mediating role in the relationship between differentiation and marital intimacy (P= 0.001).
Conclusion: Based on the findings, differentiation affects marital trust, sense of security and intimacy. Therefore, by increasing the differentiation of people in marital trust, their intimacy and sense of security can be increased.

Keywords

References

  1. Welsh EM, French SA, Wall M. Examining the relationship between family meal frequency and individual dietary intake: does family cohesion play a role? J Nutr Educ Behav 2011; 43 (4): 229-35.
  2. Kalkan M, Ersanli E. The Effects of the Marriage enrichment program based on the cognitive-behavioral approach on the marital djustment of ouples. Educ Sci Theory Pract 2008; 8(3): 977-86.
  3. Klever P. Goal direction and effectiveness, emotional maturity, and nuclear family functioning. J Marit Fam Ther 2009; 35 (3): 308-24.
  4. DeCesare SD. Anxiety and depression: Self differentiation as a unique predictor. Ph.D. Dissertation, Marywood University.
  5. Peleg O, Halaby E, Whaby EN. The relationship of maternal separation anxiety and differentiation of self to children's separation anxiety and adjustment to kindergarten: A study in Druze families. J Anxiety Disord 2006; 20(8): 973-95.
  6. Conroy AA, McGrath N, VanRooyen H, Hosegood V, Johnson MO, Fritz K, et al. Power and the association with relationship quality in South African couples: Implications for HIV / AIDS interventions. Soc Sci Med 2016; 153: 1-14.
  7. Ferreira LC, Narciso I, Novo R. Authenticity, work and change: A qualitative study on couple intimacy. Fam Relatsh Soc 2013; 2(3): 339-54.
  8. Patrick S, Sells JN, Giordano FG, Tollerud TR. Intimacy, differentiation, and personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction. Fam J 2007; 15(4): 359-67.
  9. Dandurand C, Lafontaine MF. Intimacy and couple satisfaction: The moderating role of romantic attachment. Inter J Psychol Stud 2013; 5(1): 74.
  10. Knee CR, Bush AL, Sprecher S, Wenzel A, Harvey J. Relationship beliefs and their role in romantic relationship initiation. Handbook of relationship initiation; 2008: 471-85.
  11. Kruse N. The relationship between self differentiation and the levels of trust, shame, and guilt in intimate relationships. Alliant International University, Los Angeles, 2007.
  12. Williams ML. Romantic love communication: Examination of equity and effects on relational, sexual, and communication satisfaction. USA: Kent State University; 2012.
  13. Maslow AH, Birsh E, Honigmann I, McGrath F, Plason A, Stein M. Manual for the Security-Insecurity Inventory. Stanford: Stanford University; 1952.
  14. Zhang Y, Fang Y, Wei KK, Chen H. Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. Inter J Inform Manag 2010; 30(5): 425-36.
  15. Raina S, Bhan KS. A study of security-insecurity feelings among adolescents in relation to sex, family system and ordinal position. International journal of educational planning and administration 2013; 3 (1): 51-60
  16. Meneses CW, Greenberg LS. The construction of a model of the process of couples ’forgiveness in emotion ‐ focused therapy for couples. J Marit Fam Ther 2011; 37(4): 491-502.
  17. Patrick S, Sells JN, Giordano FG, Tollerud TR. Intimacy, differentiation, and personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction. Fam J 2007; 15(4): 359-67.
  18. Etemadi A. [Evaluation and comparison of the effectiveness of psycho-educational approach based on cognitive-behavioral and therapeutic communication on intimacy of couples referring to counseling centers in Isfahan]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tarbiat Modarres University, 2004: 68-72. (Persian)
  19. Shirdel M, Hosseinian S, Kimiaei SA, Safarian MR. [Estimating the validity and reliability of Gottman Questionnaires of “Couple Trust Measurement”]. Contemporary family therapy 2019; 41(1): 37-46. (Persian)
  20. Zare H, Aminpour H. [Psychological tests] Tehran: Ayizh; 2012: 24-31. (Persian)
  21. Maser MJ. A construct validity study of differentiation of self measures and their correlates. Seton Hall University; 2011.
  22. Finzi-Dottan R, Schiff M. Couple relationship satisfaction: The role of recollection of parental acceptance, self-differentiation, and spousal care giving. J Soc Pers Relat 2021.
  23. Hooper LM, DePuy V. Mediating and moderating effects of differentiation of self on depression symptomatology in a rural community sample. Fam J 2010; 18 (4): 358-68.
  24. Lampis J, Cataudella S, Agus M, Busonera A, Skowron EA. Differentiation of self and dyadic adjustment in couple relationships: A dyadic analysis using the actor- partner interdependence model. Fam Process 2019; 58(3): 698-715.
  25. Wang F, Edwards KJ, Hill PC. Humility as a relational virtue: Establishing trust, empowering repair, and building marital well-being. Journal of psychology and Christianity 2017; 36(2): 168-75.
  26. Orathinkal J, Vansteenwegen A. The effect of forgiveness on marital satisfaction in relation to marital stability. Contemp Fam Ther 2006; 28(2): 251-60.
  27. Simpson JA, Overall NC. Partner buffering of attachment insecurity. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2014; 23(1): 54-9.
  28. Engdahl E, Lidskog R. Risk, communication and trust: Towards an emotional understanding of trust. Public Underst Sci 2014; 23(6): 703-17.
  29. Taormina RJ, Sun R. Antecedents and outcomes of psychological insecurity and interpersonal trust among Chinese people. Psychol Thought 2015; 8(2): 173-88.
  30. Norgren MD, Souza RM, Kaslow F, Hammerschmidt H, Sharlin SA. Marital satisfaction in long lasting marriages: a feasible construction. Stud Psychol 2004; 9(3): 575-84.

 

 

Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 23, Issue 5
September and October 2021
Pages 367-374

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics