The relationship between personality factors and smart phone use among university students

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD. student in psychological and educational counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 MA. in psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 MA. Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Smart phone use is one of the phenomena of this age and has had a profound effect on the various aspects of human life today, therefore, different aspects of smart phone use should be identified to make use of this device more targeted and to reduce its ineffective use with knowledge. In this study, the basic role of personality factors in using smart phone was investigated.
Materials and Methods: In this study 64 peoples were selected by systematic random and random cluster sampling method from the students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran in 2018-2019. Then the questionnaire of smart phone and computer use and Neo personality questionnaire were completed. Spearman rank correlation test and SPSS version 24 were used for data analysis.
 Results: The findings of the study indicated that there is a relationship between gender and age with the amount of smart phone use (P=0.007, P=0.03) and on the other hand, the weaker responsibility and agreeableness personality are associated to the greater use of smart phone (P=0.01, P=0.03).
 Conclusion: The results of this study showed the role of gender as well as personality factors such as agreeableness and responsibility in smart phone use.

Keywords

References

  1. Falaki H, Mahajan R, Kandula S, Lymberopoulos D, Govindan R, Estrin D. [Diversity in smartphone usage]. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. Iran; 2010. (Persian)
  2. Mohammadbeigi A, Valizadeh F, Saadati M, Sharifimoghadam S, Ahmadi A, Mokhtari M, et al. [Sleep quality in medical students; the impact of over-use of mobile cell-phone and social networks]. Journal of research in health sciences 2016; 16(1): 46-50. (Persian)
  3. Oulasvirta A, Rattenbury TL, Raita E. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 2012; 16(1): 105-14.
  4. Pervin LA. The science of personality. Oxford: Oxford University; 2003.
  5. Lin CY, Imani V, Broström A, Nilsen P, Fung XC, Griffiths MD, et al. Smartphone application-based addiction among Iranian adolescents: A psychometric study. Int J Ment Health Addict 2019; 17(4): 765-80.
  6. Miller G. The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012; 7(3): 221-37.
  7. Takao M, Takahashi S, Kitamura M. Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use. Cyber Psychol Behav 2009; 12(5): 501-7.
  8. Pashasharifi H. [The relationship between creativity and personality characteristics of Tehran high school students]. Educational innovations 2004; 3(1): 3-11. (Persian)
  9. Rezaei F. [Investigating the relationship between mobile phone harmful use and Internet addiction with emotional divorce of teachers in Kermanshah city]. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi 2020; 9(3): 69-76. (Persian)
  10. Coyne SM, Stockdale L, Summers K. Problematic cell phone use, depression, anxiety, and self-regulation: Evidence from a three year longitudinal study from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Comput Human Behav 2019; 96: 78-84.
  11. Bianchi A, Phillips JG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyber Psychol Behav 2005; 8(1): 39-51.
  12. Butt S, Phillips JG. Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Comput Human Behav 2008; 24(2): 346-60.
  13. Ehrenberg A, Juckes S, White KM, Walsh SP. Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people's technology use. Cyber Psychol Behav 2008; 11(6): 739-41.
  14. Hussain Z, Griffiths MD, Sheffield D. An investigation into problematic smartphone use: The role of narcissism, anxiety, and personality factors. J Behav Addict 2017; 6(3): 378-86.
  15. Jiang K, Yang Z, Feng Z, Yu Z, Bao S, Huang Z. Mobile phone use while cycling: a study based on the theory of planned behavior. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2019; 64(1): 388-400.
  16. Hilgard ER, Hunt RR, Kroll N, Malpeli JG. [Pychology]. Barahani MN, Birashk B. (translators). Tehran: Roshd; 2000. (Persian)
  17. Kumar K, Bakhshi A. The five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: Is there any relationship. Humanity and social sciences journal 2010; 5: 25-34.
  18. Movahedi M, Minashiri A, Panah M, Azizi A. [Relationship between personality factors and test anxiety in adolescents]. Proceeding of the 6th International Congress on Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; 2013. (Persian)
  19. Kiamehr J. [Standardization of the short form of NEO-FFI-R and investigation of factorial structure (confirmatory analysis) among the humanities students of Tehran University]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Tehran: University of Allame Tabatabai, 2003. (Persian)
  20. Ghasemi Z, Mehdad A. [Comparison of personality characteristics and attitude toward safety among incident and non-incident staff]. Journal of occupational health 2018; 14(6): 47-56. (Persian)
  21. Mehdad A, Molavi M. [Comparison of organizational commitment, job stress and personality traits among injured and non-injured employees of Isfahan refinery]. Journal of occupational medicine 2020; 11(4) : 36-47. 9Persian)
  22. Bayrami M, Movahedi M, Movahedi Y, Azizi A, Rahimi A. [The role of personality factors in predicting migraine symptoms in nurses. Iranian journal of nursing 2013; 26: 71-79. (Persian)
  23. McCrae RR, Costa PT. A contemplated revision of NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Pers Individ Diff 2004; 36: 587-96.
  24. Akbari R, Zarei E, Dormohammadi A, Gholami A. [Influence of unsafe and excessive use of mobile phone on the sleep quality]. Scientific journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences 2016; 21(5): 81-90. (Persian)
  25. Ezoe S, Toda M, Yoshimura K, Naritomi A, Den R, Morimoto K. Relationships of personality and lifestyle with mobile phone dependence among female nursing students. Soc Behav Pers 2009; 37(2): 231-8.
  26. Lepp A, Li J, Barkley JE, Salehi-Esfahani S. Exploring the relationships between college students’ cell phone use, personality and leisure. Comput Human Behav 2015; 43: 210-9.
  27. Bazrafshan M, Ghaedian S, Foroutani M, Gholami Y. [An analysis of secondary high school students' personality dimensions and the use of virtual social networks in the 4th district of Shiraz city, 2014]. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences 2018; 16(10): 913-24. (Persian)
  28. Rashidi AR, Jafari T, Hojatkhah M, Mohammadi F, Mahboobi M, Zahedi A, et al. [The relationship between personality traits, loneliness, and identity styles and dependence on mobile phone in students, 2014]. Sadra medical sciences journal 2016; 4(1): 43-49. (Persian)

 



 

Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health
Volume 23, Issue 2
March and April 2021
Pages 141-147

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics