بررسی تأثیر استفاده از تلفن همراه بر میزان توجه و عملکرد تحصیلی دانش آموزان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. student in educational psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Assistant professor, Department of Education, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

3 Payame Noor University, Isfahan, Iran,

چکیده

مقدمه: در این پژوهش به بررسی تأثیر استفاده از تلفن همراه بر میزان توجه و عملکرد تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی می‌پردازیم.
روش‌ کار: در این مطالعه علی- مقایسه‌ای، 120 نفر از دانش‌آموزان هنرستان شهرستان درمیان به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. آنها پرسشنامه اعتیاد به تلفن همراه، تست استروپ رایانه ای و تست عملکرد تحصیلی را تکمیل کردند. داده ها با استفاده از آمار توصیفی و تحلیل واریانس یک طرفه مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها حاکی از ارتباط معنادار بین استفاده از تلفن همراه و توجه و عملکرد تحصیلی بود (05/0> P). به طور خاص، افزایش استفاده از تلفن همراه دانش آموزان با کاهش توجه و عملکرد تحصیلی پایین، ارتباط دارد. علاوه بر این، استفاده از تلفن همراه بر عملکرد تحصیلی در دروس عملی و نظری تأثیر متفاوتی گذاشت.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج مطالعه ما تأثیر منفی بالقوه استفاده بیش از حد از تلفن همراه را بر توجه و عملکرد تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان برجسته می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Dehmler KM. Adolescent technology usage during sleep-time: Does it influence their quality of sleep, attention difficulties and academic performance?. Rochester: Rochester Institute of Technology College of Liberal Arts; 2009.
  2. Walsh SP, White KM, Young RM. Over- connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between Australian youth and their mobile phone. J Adolesc 2008; 31: 77-92.
  3. Shoreshie A. [Use of mobile phones while driving and their role in increasing accidents and reducing safety]. Journal of traffic management studies 2007; 3: 95-108. (Persian)
  4. Lansdown TC, Stephens AN. Couples, contentious conversations, mobile telephone use and driving. Accid Anal Prev 2013; 50: 416-22.‏
  5. Beck KH, Yan F, Wang M. Cell phone users, reported crash risk, unsafe driving behaviors and dispositions: A survey of motorists in Maryland. J Safety Res 2007; 38: 683-88.
  6. Eraqi HM, Abouelnaga Y, Saad MH, Moustafa MN. Driver distraction identification with an ensemble of convolutional neural networks. Journal of advanced transportation 2019; Article ID: 4125865.
  7. Mendoza JS, Pody BC, Lee S, Kim M, McDonough IM. The effect of cellphones on attention and learning: The influences of time, distraction, and nomophobia. Comput Hum Behav 2018; 86: 52-60.‏
  8. Abedi A, Malekpour M. [The effectiveness of educational-psychological early interventions on improving executive performance and the attention of children with psychological nervous learning disabilities]. Journal of modern educational approaches 2010; 5(1): 65-86. (Persian)
  9. Stevens C, Bavelier D. The role of selective attention on academic foundations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2012; 25: 30- 48.
  10. Samaha M, Hawi NS. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Comput Hum Behav 2016; 57: 321-25.
  11. Alkın S, Bardakcı S, İlhan An investigation of the associations between the quality of social relationships and smartphone addiction in high school students. The Turkish journal on addictions 2020; 7(1): 29-40.
  12. Zhao F. Using quiz to integrate fun multiplayer activity in the accounting classroom. Int J High Educ 2019; 8(1): 37-43.
  13. Prensky M. The emerging online life of the digital native. [cited 7 August 2008]. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Emerging-Online-Life-of-the-Digital-Native Prensky/9e4ac6c046a2c211568cd4d4caf2059f1f3a9009
  14. Ayati M, Sarani H. [Impact of mobile phone education on the motivation and attitude of English language students]. Journal of educational technology 2011; 7(1): 13-21. (Persian)
  15. Raja R, Nagasubramani PC. Impact of modern technology in education. J Appl Adv Res 2018; 3(1): 33-35.
  16. Kim S, Jeong SH, Kim HS, Jeong YJ. Academic success of online learning in Undergraduate nursing education programs in the COVID-19 pandemic era. J Prof Nurs 2022; 38: 6-16.
  17. Crompton H, Burke D. The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Comput Educ 2018; 123: 53-64.
  18. Hassan Abadi HR, Sarmad Z, Ghazi Tabatabai M. [Managing the division of attention and redundancy in multimedia learning environments: Evidence of dual processing systems in working memory]. Iranian journal of psychology 2008; 5(7): 27-41. (Persian)
  19. Sternberg, R. [Cognitive psychology]. Kharazi K, Hejazi E. (translators). Tehran: SAMT; 2010. (Persian)
  20. Delavar A. [Research methods in psychology and educational sciences]. Tehran: Virayesh; 2022. (Persian)
  21. Jafarzadeh E. [The relationship between mobile addiction and mental health in students at Birjand University]. MS. Dissertation. Birjand: University of Birjand, 2012. (Persian)
  22. Homack S, Riccio CA. A meta- analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Stroop color and word test with children. Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19: 725-43.
  23. Mashhadi A, Rasoulzadeh Tabatabaee K, Azadehfalah P, Soltanifar A. [Comparison of response inhibition and interference control in children with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder and normal children]. Journal of clinical psychology 2009; 1(2): 37-50. (Persian)
  24. May KE, Elder AD. Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2018; 15(1): 1-17.
  25. Fischer HA, Holentunder KA, Lemanski AL, Morelli ME. The negative aspects of cell phones: Interpersonal communication, effects on youth and academics, health risks, and driving. University of Wisconsin Whitewater; 2011.
  26. Thomas S, Benke G, Dimitriadis C, Inyang I, Sim RM, Wolfe R, et al. Use of mobile phones and changes in cognitive function in adolescents. Occup Environ Med 2010; 67: 861-66.
  27. Strayer DL, Cooper JM, Turrill J, Coleman J, Medeiros-Ward N, Biondi F. Measuring cognitive distraction in the automobile. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2013.
  28. Lin TT, Chiang YH. Investigating predictors of smartphone dependency symptoms and effects on academic performance, improper phone use and perceived sociability. International journal of mobile communications 2017; 15(6): 655-76.
  29. Felisoni DD, Godoi AS. Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Comput Educ 2018; 117: 175-87.‏
  30. Sadoughi M. [The relationship between problematic mobile usage and academic performance among students: The mediating role of sleep quality]. Education strategies in medical sciences 2017; 10(2): 123-32.‏ (Persian)
  31. Fook CY, Narasuman S, Abdul Aziz N, Tau Han C. Smartphone usage among university students. Asian journal of university education 2021; 7(1): 282-91.
  32. Rosen LD, Carrier LM, Cheever NA. Facebook and testing made me do it: Media-induced task switching while studying. Comput Hum Behav 2013; 29: 948-58.
  33. Hofmann W, Schmeichel BJ, Baddeley AD. Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends Cogn Sci 2012; 16(3): 174-80.‏
مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 25، شماره 4
مرداد و شهریور 1402
صفحه 271-277

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار