ویژگی خصومت و پرخاشگری به عنوان تابعی جزئی از ذهن آگاهی پایین تر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND.

2 Psychology, Center for Cognitive and Visual Neuroscience, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.

چکیده

مقدمه: ذهن آگاهی گرایشی هنوز در رابطه با شاخص های ناسازگاری مورد بررسی قرار نگرفته است.
روش‌ کار: این مطالعه ارتباط بین ذهن‌آگاهی تمایلی، خصومت صفت، پرخاشگری در طول زندگی و شاخص‌های ناسازگاری اضافی را در یک دانشگاه (N=945) و یک نمونه ملی (N=239) برقرار کرد. ما نمونه ها را از طریق یک نظرسنجی الکترونیکی ارزیابی کردیم. نمونه کالج از طریق گروه روانشناسی اعتبار اضافی در دانشگاه ایالتی داکوتای شمالی جمع آوری شد. یک نظرسنجی مختصر در نمونه ملی با استفاده از انگیزه مالی برای مشارکت انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: در 19 شاخص از 31 شاخص ناسازگاری، بین کمترین (زیر صدک 20) پاسخ‌دهندگان و باقی‌مانده‌ها تفاوت معنی‌داری مشاهده شد. اندازه اثر گروهی معنی‌دار (d) به طور میانگین 0.49 با بالاترین 0.94 (درمان روانپزشکی قبلی در نمونه ملی) بود (P<0.001).
 
نتیجه‌گیری: ذهن آگاهی با گرایش به پرخاشگری فیزیکی همراه بود که توسط شاخص‌های متعدد نشان داده شد. این نتایج نشان می‌دهد که نگرانی اصلی ناشی از ذهن آگاهی پایین، نگرش‌های خصمانه نسبت به دیگران است که به اعمال خشونت‌آمیز در میان زیرمجموعه کوچک‌تری از این گروه پرخطر گسترش می‌یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. McDonald DA, Friedman HL. Growing up and waking up: A conversation with Ken Wilber about leaving transpersonal to form integral psychology. J Hum Psychol 2024; 64(3): 327-42.
  2. Berdida DJ, Lopez V, Grande RA. Nursing students’ perceived stress, social support, self-efficacy, resilience, mindfulness and psychological well-being: A structural equation model. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32(5): 1390-404.
  3. Lightsey Jr OR, Smith IVBN. Resilience, generalized self-efficacy, and mindfulness as moderators of the relationship between stress and well-being. J Cogn Psychother 2024; 38(1): 3-23.
  4. Aldbyani A, Alabyadh M, Ma B, Lv Y, Leng J, Guo Q. Dispositional mindfulness associated with less academic burnout among Muslim students during the COVID-19 pandemic. S Afr J Educ 2023; 43(3): 1-7.
  5. An Y, Schoebi D, Xu W. How does mindfulness modulate daily stress response: Evidences from ambulatory assessment? Psychol Health 2019; 34(3): 355-67.
  6. Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003; 84(4): 822-48.
  7. Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment 2006; 13(1): 27-45.
  8. Bjureberg J, Ojala O, Berg A, Edvardsson E, Kolbeinsson Ö, Molander O, et al. Targeting maladaptive anger with brief therapist-supported internet-delivered emotion regulation treatments: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2023; 91(5): 254-66.
  9. Clark LB. Utilizing mindfulness based CBT to address anger and aggression in middle schools. J Child Adolesc Couns 2020; 6(2): 97-109.
  10. Shepherd G. “Normally I’d get really agitated, but I just laughed!”: What do participants reflect upon in a transactional analysis/mindfulness based Anger Management Programme? Br J Guid Counc 2020; 48(4): 537-51.
  11. Hafner N, Pepping CA, Wertheim EH. Dispositional mindfulness, rejection sensitivity, and behavioural responses to rejection: The role of emotion regulation. Aust J Psychol 2019; 71(2): 163-70.
  12. Wang T, Qi W. Mindfulness may buffer the longitudinal influence of peer rejection on adolescents’ prosocial behavior: A cross-lagged study. J Soc Pers Relat 2023; 40(9): 3051-64.
  13. Shepherd G, Cant M. Difficult to change? The differences between successful and not‐so‐successful participation in Anger Management Groups. Couns Psychother Res 2019; 20(2): 214-23.
  14. Quaglia JT, Zeidan F, Grossenbacher PG, Freeman SP, Braun SE, Martelli A, et al. Brief mindfulness training enhances cognitive control in socioemotional contexts: Behavioral and neural evidence. PLoS One 2019; 14(7): e0219862.
  15. Ortet G, Pinazo D, Walker D, Gallego S, Mezquita L, Ibáñez MI. Personality and nonjudging make you happier: Contribution of the five-factor model, mindfulness facets and a mindfulness intervention to subjective well-being. PLoS One 2020; 15(2): e0228655.
  16. Chan KK, Leung DC. The impact of mindfulness on self-stigma and affective symptoms among sexual minorities. J Affect Disord 2021; 286: 213-9.
  17. Hsu T, Forestell CA. Mindfulness, depression, and emotional eating: The moderating role of nonjudging of inner experience. Appetite 2021; 160: 105089.
  18. Fendel JC, Aeschbach VM, Schmidt S, Göritz AS. The impact of a tailored mindfulness-based program for resident physicians on distress and the quality of care: A randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med 2021; 290(6): 1233-48.
  19. Yang T, Chen G, Bi C. Interpersonal mindfulness and forgiveness: Examining the mediating roles of anger rumination and State anger. Aggress Behav 2022; 48(5): 466-74.
  20. Gillions A, Cheang R, Duarte R. The effect of mindfulness practice on aggression and violence levels in adults: A systematic review. Aggress Viol Behav 2019; 48: 104-15.
  21. Poorebrahim A, Lin C-Y, Imani V, Kolvani SS, Alaviyoun SA, Ehsani N, et al. Using mindful attention awareness scale on male prisoners: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Rasch models. PLoS One 2021; 16(7: e0254333.
  22. Buss AH, Perry M. The Aggression Questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol 1992; 63(3): 452-9.
  23. Rahrig H, Bjork JM, Tirado C, Chester DS, Creswell JD, Lindsay EK, et al. Punishment on pause: Preliminary evidence that mindfulness training modifies neural responses in a reactive aggression task. Front Behav Neurosci 2021; 15: 689373.
  24. King A, Bailley M, Moe B. External validity considerations regarding college participant samples comprised substantially of psychology majors. In: Shohov SP. (editor). Advances in psychology research. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Sciences Publishers; 2004: 71-85.
  25. Nooripour R, Ghanbari N, Hoseinian S, Vakili Y, Dobkins K. Psychometric validation of the Farsi version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in a sample of Iranian students in the USA. Int J Ment Health Addict 2021; 21(2): 729-39.
  26. King AR, Russell TD, Bailly MD. Psychometric properties of the lifetime assessment of violent acts. Violence Vict 2017; 32(6): 998-1013.
  27. Levenson MR, Kiehl KA, Fitzpatrick CM. Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995; 68(1): 151-8.
  28. Dickison E, Sellbom M. The Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. In: Jonason PK. (editor). Shining light on the dark side of personality: Measurement properties and theoretical advances. Berlin, Germany: Hogrefe; 2023: 138-50.
  29. Raskin R, Terry H. A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54(5): 890-902.
  30. Henttonen P, Salmi J, Peräkylä A, Krusemark EA. Grandiosity, vulnerability, and narcissistic fluctuation: Front Psychol 2022; 13: 993663.
  31. Wright PH. The essence of personal relationships and their value for the individual. In: Graham G, LaFollette H. (editors). Person to person. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University; 1989: 15-31.
  32. Eckblad M, Chapman LJ. Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality. J Abnorm Psychol 1986; 95(3): 214-22.
  33. Schalet BD, Durbin CE, Revelle W. Multidimensional structure of the hypomanic personality scale. Psychol Assess 2011; 23(2): 504-22.
  34. Khavari KA, Farber PD. A profile instrument for the quantification and assessment of alcohol consumption. The Khavari Alcohol Test. J Stud Alcohol 1978; 39(9): 1525-39.
  35. Selzer ML. The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Am J Psychiatry 1971; 127(12): 1653-8.
  36. Santos G-M, Strathdee SA, El-Bassel N, Patel P, Subramanian D, Horyniak D, et al. Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20(1): 106.
  37. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 1985; 49(1): 71-5.
  38. Pretorius TB, Padmanabhanunni A. Assessing the cognitive component of subjective well-being: Revisiting the satisfaction with life scale with classical test theory and item response theory. African journal of psychological assessment 2022; 4: a106.
  39. Cox NJ. Speaking Stata: Correlation with confidence, or Fisher’s z revisited. The Stata journal 2008; 8(3): 413-39.
  40. Clark EL, Gulley LD, Prince MA, Casamassima M, Sanchez N, Jimenez V, et al. The role of mindfulness in associations among depression symptoms, sleep duration, and insulin resistance in adolescents. J Behav Med 2021; 44(5): 694-703.
مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 26، شماره 3
خرداد و تیر 1403
صفحه 195-203

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار