پیش‌بینی بهزیستی روان‌شناختی بر اساس ارزش‌های بنیادی و خودفراروی: نقش واسطه ای نگرش به زمان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. in educational psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Science, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

2 Ph.D. in psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Science, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

چکیده

مقدمه: این پژوهش با هدف پیش‌بینی بهزیستی روان‌شناختی مبتنی بر ارزش‌های بنیادی و خودفراروی با تأمل در نگرش به زمان انجام شد.
 
روش‌ کار: در این مطالعه توصیفی از نوع همبستگی، تعداد 372 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان در سال تحصیلی 98-1397 به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزارها شامل مقیاس های رضایت از زندگی، نگرش به زمان، تعالی از خود و ارزش های بنیادی بود. داده ها با مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری، SPSS-25  و نرم افزار لیزرل، تحلیل شدند
 
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها نشان داد که مدل پیشنهادی برازش خوبی با داده‌ها دارد (92/0 GFI=، 93/0=IFI، 93/0=CFI). همچنین تأثیر خودفراروی و ارزش‌های بنیادی بر مثبت گذشته، حال مثبت و آینده مثبت و تأثیر گذشته مثبت، حال مثبت و آینده مثبت بر رضایت از زندگی معنادار است (05/0> P). همچنین متغیرهای گذشته مثبت (Z=2.92، P<0.01)، حال مثبت (Z=8.44، P<0.01) و مثبت آینده (Z=5.73، P<0.01) نقش میانجی معناداری در رابطه بین خودفراروی و رضایت از زندگی همچنین گذشته مثبت (Z=3.04، P<0.01)، حال مثبت (Z=8.75، P<0.01) و آینده مثبت (Z=6.18، P<0.01) نقش واسطه ای معناداری در رابطه بین ارزش های بنیادی و رضایت از زندگی دارد.
 
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان می‌دهد زمانی که افراد بر اساس ارزش‌های بنیادی در زندگی عمل می‌کنند، مرزهای شخصی شان در حوزه‌های درون فردی، بین فردی، فرافردی و زمانی گسترش یافته و از سطح آنها فراتر می‌رود. این باعث می شود نگرش آنها نسبت به گذشته، حال و آینده مثبت تر شده و رضایت از زندگی و بهزیستی روانی آنها افزایش می یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Charry C, Goig R, Martínez I. Psychological well-being and youth autonomy: Comparative analysis of Spain and Colombia. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 564232.
  2. Ryff CD. Entrepreneurship and eudaimonic well-being: five venues for new science. J Bus Ventur 2019; 34: 646-63.
  3. Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC. How healthy are we?: A national study of well-being at midlife. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2019.
  4. Bojanowska A, Piotrowski Values and psychological well-being among adolescents–are some values ‘healthier’than others? Eur J Dev Psychol 2019; 16: 402-16.
  5. Scaffidi Abbate C, Miceli Psychological well-being among adolescents and youth. Healthcare 2022; 10: 2059.
  6. Dhanabhakyam M, Sarath M. Psychological wellbeing: A systematic literature review. International journal of advanced research in science, communication and technology 2023; 3(1): 603-7.
  7. Oyserman D. Psychology of values. In: Wright JD. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015: 36-40.
  8. Brown KW, Kasser T. Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and life style. Soc Indic Res 2005; 74: 349-68.
  9. Ciarrochi L, Fisher D, Lane L. The link between value motives, value success, and well-being among people diagnosed with cancer. Psychooncology 2011; 20(11): 1184-92. 
  10. Jason LA, Reichler A, King C, Derryk M, Camacho J, Marchese The measurement of wisdom: A preliminary effort. J Community Psychol 2001; 29: 585-98.
  11. Worth P, Smith MD. Clearing the pathways to self-transcendence. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 648381.
  12. Barton C, Hart R. The experience of self-transcendence in social activists. Behav Sci 2023; 13: 66.
  13. Runquist JJ, Reed PG. Self-transcendence and well-being in homeless adults. J Holist Nurs 2007; 25: 1-13.
  14. Sharpnack PA, Benders AM, Fitzpatrick JJ. Self-transcendence and spiritual well-being in the Amish. J Holist Nurs 2011; 29: 91-7.
  15. Haugan G, Rannestad T, Hammervold R, Garasen H, Espnes GA. The relationships between self-transcendence and spiritual well-being in cognitively intact nursing home patients. Int J Older People Nurs 2014; 9(1): 65-78.
  16. Farren AT. Power, uncertainty, self-transcendence, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Nurs Sci Q 2010; 23: 63-71.
  17. Froiland JM, Worrell FC, Olenchak FR, Kowalski MJ. Positive and negative attitude to times, intrinsic motivation, behavioral engagement and substance use among urban adolescents. Addict Res Theory 2020. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2020.1857740
  18. Leite A, Rami Res A, Moura A, Souto T, Marôco J. Psychological well-being and health perception: Predictors for past, present and future. Arch Clin Psychiatry 2019; 46(3): 53-60.
  19. Muqodas I, Kartadinata S, Nurihsan J, Dahlan T, Yusuf S, Imaddudin A. Psychological well-being: A preliminary study of guidance and counseling services development of pre-service teachers in Indonesia.
    Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Psychology and Pedagogy - "Diversity in Education" (ICEPP 2019). Advances in social science, education and humanities research 2020; 399: 56-60.
  20. Toda HY, Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector auto regressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 1995; 66(1-2): 225-50.
  21. Hooman H. [Structural equation modeling using LISREL software]. Tehran: Samat; 2005. (Persian)
  22. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford; 2015: 3.
  23. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HE. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 1999; 125: 276-302.
  24. Bayani AA, Koocheky AM, Goodarzi H. [The reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale]. Journal of Iranian psychologists 2007; 3: 259-65. (Persian)
  25. Mello ZR, Worrell FC. The adolescent time inventory: Preliminary technical manual. Berkeley: Colorado Springs Co.; 2010.
  26. Rashid Kh, Alizadeh G, Moradi A. [Investigating the relationship between happiness and psychological well-being with attitude to time in students of Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan]. Clinical psychology and personality 2017; 15(2): 179-88. (Persian)
  27. Levenson M, Jenninges PA, Aldwin CM, Shiraishi RW. Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2005; 60(2): 127-43.
  28. Kordnoghabi R. [Psychology of wisdom]. Tehran: Arjmand; 2019. (Persian)
  29. Jason LA, Reichler A, King C, Derryk M, Camacho J, Marchese W. The measurement of wisdom: A preliminary effort. J Community Psychol 2001; 29: 585-98.
  30. Kordnoghabi R, Jahan F, Rashid Kh, Rezaei A. [Measuring wisdom in Iran (introduction and validation of three instruments)]. Educational measurement 2015; 6: 187-212. (Persian)
  31. Benson PL, Scales PC, Hamilton S, Sesma J. Positive youth development so far: Core hypotheses and their implications for policy and practice. Search Institute Insights and Evidence 2006; 3: 1-13.
  32. Jackson C. A study of the relationship between the developmental assets framework and the academic success of at-risk elementary to middle school transitioning students. Texas, Dallas: Dallas Baptist University; 2010.
  33. Ardelt M. Wisdom and well-being. In: Sternberg RJ, Glück J. (editors). The Cambridge handbook of wisdom; 2019: 602-25.
  34. Gubler DA, Makowski LM, Troche SJ, Schlegel K. Loneliness and well-being during the Covid-19 pandemic: Associations with personality and emotion regulation. J Happiness Stud 2021; 22(5): 2323-42.
  35. DaneshPayeh M, Dortaj F, Mazosaz A. [Explaining the psychological well-being model based on wisdom with the mediation of loneliness in women]. Social psychological studies of women 2022; 20(3): 84-109. (Persian)
  36. Houshmand Kong Sofla A, Moinizadeh M, Tabatabaei MS. [Predicting psychological well-being by examining the role of forgiveness and gratitude]. Researches in clinical and counseling psychology 2020; 10(1): 5-19. (Persian)
  37. Sadoughi M, Hesampour F. [Prediction of psychological well-being in the elderly by assessing their spirituality, gratitude to God, and perceived social support]. Iranian journal of ageing 2020; 15(2): 144-59. (Persian)
  38. Parchami Khoram M, Imani S, Ansari D. [Predicting psychological well-being based on basic psychological needs: The mediating role of social networks addiction]. Journal of research in behavioral sciences 2022; 20(2): 317-28. (Persian)
  39. Sharifi Z, Moltafet G. The prediction of psychological well-being based on gratitude, social support and self-esteem. International journal of behavioral sciences 2021; 15(2): 127-32.
  40. Harding T, Lopez V, Klainin-Yobas P. Predictors of psychological well-being among higher education students. Psychology 2019; 10: 578-94.
  41. Ataei M, Farhadi M, Rashid K. Developing a structural model for explaining psychological well-being based on ego strength and negative dimensions of attitude to time. Journal of fundamentals of mental health 2021; 23(3): 191-9.
  42. Rashid Kh, Alizade G, Moradi A. [Relationship between happiness, psychological well-being and attitude to time]. Biannual journal of clinical psychology and personality 2018; 15(2): 179-88. (Persian)
مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 26، شماره 2
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1403
صفحه 96-105

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار