مجله اصول بهداشت روانی

مجله اصول بهداشت روانی

بررسی ساختار عاملی و اعتبارسنجی فرم الکترونیکی مقیاس همبستگی خانواده (FTS) در دانشجویان در دوران بحران کرونا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
Leili Shaham 1
Azita Amirfakhraei 2
Kobra Haji Alizadeh 3
1 Ph.D. student, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
2 Assistant professor of psychology, Young Researchers and Elite Club, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
3 Associate professor of psychology, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
10.22038/jfmh.2023.23024
چکیده
مقدمه: شیوع ویروس کرونا بر استفاده از ابزارهای فرم های چاپی تأثیر گذاشته است، بنابراین اعتبارسنجی مقیاس عملکرد خانواده به صورت آنلاین می تواند به حل مشکلات در این زمینه کمک کند. بنابراین، این مطالعه با هدف اعتبارسنجی فرم الکترونیکی مقیاس همبستگی خانواده (FTS) انجام شد.
روش‌ کار: این مطالعه توصیفی به روش روان‌سنجی انجام شد. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران در سال 1399 می باشد که تعداد نمونه ها بر اساس معیارهای روان­سنجی 100 نفر برای بخش روایی همگرا و 695 نفر برای بخش روایی سازه تعیین شد. دانشجویان به روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای انتخاب شدند. داده های پژوهش از طریق مقیاس همبستگی خانواده (FTS) و پرسشنامه ارزیابی خانواده (FAD) به صورت چاپی و الکترونیکی با ارسال لینک پرسشنامه به تلفن همراه شرکت کنندگان جمع آوری شد. برای بررسی روایی مقیاس از روش های محتوایی، همزمان، همگرا، واگرا و تحلیل عاملی استفاده شد. ما قابلیت اطمینان آن را با استفاده از روش‌های سازگاری داخلی و قابلیت اطمینان تقسیم به نصف بررسی کردیم.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی نشان داد که فرم الکترونیکی مقیاس کارکرد خانواده از پنج عامل تشکیل شده و از روایی و پایایی مناسبی برخوردار است. تحلیل عاملی تاییدی نیز مدل پنج عاملی را تایید کرد. این پرسشنامه همراه با پرسشنامه ارزیابی خانواده انجام شد. نتایج حاکی از همبستگی مثبت و معنادار بین دو مقیاس بود (67/0=r؛ 001/0>P).
نتیجه‌گیری: بر اساس نتایج، می‌توان از مقیاس 30 سؤالی عملکرد خانواده برای سنجش عملکرد خانواده در دانش‌آموزان ایرانی استفاده کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
کووید-19
ساختار عاملی
عملکرد خانواده
مقیاس
  1. Xie S, Wu D, Liang L. Family environment profile in China and its relation to family structure and young children’s social competence. Early Educ Dev 2022; 33(3): 469-89.
  2. Blackwell AH, Asghar K, de Dieu Hategekimana J, Roth D, O’Connor M, Falb K. Family functioning in humanitarian contexts: Correlates of the Feminist-Grounded Family Functioning Scale among men and women in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. J Child Fam Stud 2023; 32: 197–210.
  3. Brickell TA, French LM, Sullivan JK, Varbedian NV, Wright MM, Lange RT. Unhealthy family functioning is associated with health-related quality of life among military spouse caregivers. Psychol Trauma 2022; 14(4): 587.
  4. Zhang H, Han T, Ma S, Qu G, Zhao T, Ding X, et al. Association of child maltreatment and bullying victimization among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of family function, resilience, and anxiety. J Affect Disord 2022; 299: 12-21.
  5. Erickson SJ, Dinces S, Kubinec N, Annett RD. Pediatric cancer survivorship: Impact upon hair cortisol concentration and family functioning. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2022; 29(4): 943-53.
  6. Mohanty J, Chokkanathan S, Alberton AM. COVID‐19–related stressors, family functioning and mental health in Canada: Test of indirect effects. Fam Relat 2022; 71(2): 445-62.
  7. Brantley E, Darden M, Ku L. Associations of expanding parental medicaid eligibility and parental health and family functioning. Acad Pediatr 2022; 22(4): 622-30.
  8. Pu DF, Rodriguez CM. Child and parent factors predictive of mothers’ and fathers’ perceived family functioning. J Fam Psychol 2023; 37(1): 121-31.
  9. Mikolajczak M, Raes M-E, Avalosse H, Roskam I. Exhausted parents: Sociodemographic, child-related, parent-related, parenting and family-functioning correlates of parental burnout. Key topics in parenting and behavior. Berlin: Springer; 2022: 57-69.
  10. Russ SA, Hotez E, Berghaus M, Hoover C, Verbiest S, Schor EL, et al. Building a life course intervention research framework. Pediatrics 2022; 149(Suppl 5): e2021053509E.
  11. Turanovic JJ. Exposure to violence and victimization: Reflections on 25 years of research from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. J Adolesc Health 2022; 71(6): S14-S23.
  12. Kelley AN, Curtis MG, Wieling E. Expanding the traumatic stress framework to incorporate a socioecological family systems perspective. Fam Process 2022; 61(2): 476-89.
  13. Randerson K. Conceptualizing family business social responsibility. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2022; 174: 121225.
  14. Nodira T, Rashid X. Problems of innovation management in the higher education system. Web of scientist: International scientific research journal 2022; 3(11): 155-64.
  15. Fischer H-TM. The impact of natural hazard-induced disasters on family systems: A meta-ethnography: Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; 2022.
  16. Gallo Garcia C. Be the change that you want to see in the world: A moral economy of volunteering for female empowerment in Brazil. Womens Stud 2023; 52(1): 61-78.
  17. Yarmohamadian A, Mokhtari E. [The relation between family function and coping styles with stressful situations among female students of Isfahan University in 2013]. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences 2015; 14(9): 713-28. (Perisian)
  18. Kahrazee F, Rigi Kooteh B. [Relationship between the family function with academic self-regulation among the nursing students]. Bimonthly of education strategies in medical sciences 2016; 9(3): 186-93. (Persian)
  19. Hosseini FS, Fereshte M. [Relationship between family function with use of social networks in high school students]. Journal of applied psychological research 2016; 7(2): 153-65. (Persian)
  20. Ramaswami SB, Jensen T, Berghaus M, De-Oliveira S, Russ SA, Weiss-Laxer N, et al. Family health development in life course research: A scoping review of family functioning measures. Pediatrics 2022; 149(Suppl 5): e2021053509J.
  21. Puffer ES, Giusto A, Rieder AD, Friis-Healy E, Ayuku D, Green EP. Development of the Family Togetherness Scale: A mixed-methods validation study in Kenya. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 662991.
  22. Yuan C, Yong G, Wang X, Xie T, Wang C, Yuan Y, et al. Developing the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 for a greater impact on the quality of life of patients with functional dyspepsia compared to Somatic Symptom Scale-8. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20(1): 359.
  23. Hosseini Nasab A, Sanjari S, Mohammadi Soleimani MR, Alidousti K. An investigation into the effects of COVID-19 vaccines on Iranian women’s menstrual cycle. Ital J Gynæcol Obstet 2023. (in press)
  24. Sanjari S. [Relationship between self-concept, resilience and differentiation with Corona virus anxiety in hospital intensive care unit nurses]. Journal of critical care nursing 2022; 15(1): 1-21. (Persian)
  25. Sanjari S, AmirFakhraei A, Mohammidi Soliemani MR, Alidousti K. Validation of the Slade Fear of Childbirth Scale for Pregnancy in a sample of Iranian women: A cross-sectional study. Crescent journal of medical and biological sciences 2022; 9(3): 138-46.
  26. Sanjari S, Soleimani MRM. Validation of the Persian version of the Engagement in E-Learning Scale in students of the School of Nursing and Midwifery in Iran. Middle East journal of rehabilitation and health studies 2023; 10(3): e134881
  27. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital Fam Ther 1983; 9(2): 171-80.
  28. Pourmovahed Z, Pourmovahed Z, Zareymahmoodabadi H. [Effect of Family-centered care on family function of preterm newborns hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)]. Nursing and midwifery journal 2021; 19(10): 773-82. (Persian)
  29. Beierlein V, Bultmann JC, Möller B, von Klitzing K, Flechtner H-H, Resch F, et al. Measuring family functioning in families with parental cancer: Reliability and validity of the German adaptation of the Family Assessment Device (FAD). J Psychosom Res 2017; 93: 110-17.
  30. Kabacoff RI, Miller IW, Bishop DS, Epstein NB, Keitner GI. A psychometric study of the McMaster Family Assessment Device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples. J Fam Psychol 1990; 3: 431-9.
  31. Yousefi N. [An investigation of the psychometric properties of the McMaster Clinical Rating Scale (MCRS)]. Educational measurement 2012; 2(7): 91-120. (Persian)
  32. Fenn J, Tan C-S, George S. Development, validation and translation of psychological tests. BJPsych Adv 2020; 26(5): 306-15.
  33. Pritchett R, Kemp J, Wilson P, Minnis H, Bryce G, Gillberg C. Quick, simple measures of family relationships for use in clinical practice and research. A systematic review. Fam Pract 2010; 28(2): 172-87.
  34. Acal C, Aguilera A, Escabias M. New modeling approaches based on varimax rotation of functional principal components. Mathematics 2020; 8: 2085.
  35. Sanjari S, Soleimani MRM, Keramat A. Development and validation of an electronic scale for sexual violence experiences in Iranian women. Crescent journal of medical and biological sciences 2023; 10(1): 27-35.
  36. Torabi B, Amirfakhrae A, Rezaei Gazaki P, Mohammadi Soleimani MR. [Investigation of factor structure and validation of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale in working children in the corona crisis: A descriptive study]. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences 2022; 21(2): 149-64. (Persian)
  37. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 2006; 28(1): 563-75.
  38. Sanjari S, Mohammadi Soleimani MR. Validation of the Knowledge Sharing Behavior Scale among nursing and midwifery faculty members in Iran: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation. Middle East journal of rehabilitation and health studies 2023; 11(1): e134886.
  39. Klever P. The Nuclear Family Functioning Scale: Initial development and preliminary validation. Fam Syst Health 2001; 19(4): 397.
  40. Falceto O, Busnello E, Bozzetti M. Validation of diagnostic scales of family functioning for use in primary health care services. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2000; 7(4): 255-63.
  41. Mejia A, Filus A, Calam R, Morawska A, Sanders MR. Measuring parenting practices and family functioning with brief and simple instruments: Validation of the Spanish version of the PAFAS. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2015; 46(3): 426-37.
  42. Goodrich KM, Gilbride DD. The refinement and validation of a model of family functioning after child's disclosure as lesbian, gay, or bisexual. J LGBT Issues Couns 2010; 4(2): 92-121.
  43. Lavorgna L, Di Tella M, Miele G, De Mercanti SF, Streito LM, Perutelli V, et al. Online validation of a battery of questionnaires for the assessment of family functioning and related factors. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 771.
  44. Shamali M, Shahriari M, Konradsen H, Akbari M, Afshari Z, Abbasinia M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Family Functioning, Health, and Social Support Questionnaire (FAFHES) in a sample of heart failure patients and their family members. J Nurs Meas 2023; 31(1): 30-43.
  45. Brinckley M-M, Jones R, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Lovett R. The development and validation of a family functioning measure for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults. BMC Public Health 2022; 22(1): 1-11.
  46. Williams V, François C, Danchenko N, Nelson L, Williams N, Yarr S, et al. Psychometric validation of the depression and family functioning scale. Curr Med Res Opin 2016; 32(4): 639-50.
  47. Aspur-León G, Pandia-Pacori J, Aleman-Ccacya X, Calizaya-López J. Validation of the family functioning style scale to assess family strengths against the Covid-19. Neuroquantology 2022; 20(7): 2750-9.
مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 25، شماره 4
مرداد و شهریور 1402
صفحه 253-262