رابطه سبک‌های پردازشگری حسی و نارسایی در کنش‌های اجرایی: نقش تعدیل کننده ویژگی‌های شخصیتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 M.A. student in clinical psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Assistant professor of psychology, Department of Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

چکیده

مقدمه: این مطالعه با هدف بررسی رابطه بین سبک های پردازش حسی بر اساس مدل دان، نقص در عملکردهای اجرایی و نقش تعدیل کننده ویژگی های شخصیتی انجام شد.
روش کار: جامعه آماری این مطالعه توصیفی- همبستگی ، کلیه دانشجویان دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد در سال تحصیلی 1398-1399 بود. از بین آنها ، 426 دانشجو از رشته های مختلف با روش نمونه گیری مناسب انتخاب شدند. اطلاعات با استفاده از پرسشنامه شخصیت کوتاه Neo-Form (NEO-FFI) ، پروفایل پردازش حسی بزرگسالان و بزرگسالان (AASP) و مقیاس بارکلی در عملکرد اجرایی (BDEFS) جمع آوری شد. داده ها با استفاده از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون سلسله مراتبی تجزیه و تحلیل شد.
یافته ها: یافته ها نشان داد که سبک های پردازشگری حسی ، ثبت پایین(001/0> P) و حساسیت پذیری حسی (01/0> P) نارسایی کنشهای اجرایی را به طور مثبت و معنی داری پیش بینی می کنند. از بین ویژگی های شخصیتی ، روان رنجوری (01/0> P) و برون گرایی (01/0> P) نارسایی کنشهای اجرایی را به طور معنی داری پیش بینی می کنند. ویژگی برون گرایی رابطه بین ثبت پایین و نارسایی کنشهای اجرایی را تعدیل می کند. لازم به ذکر است که ثبت پایین  با ویژگی شخصیتی برونگرایی 48٪ از واریانس نارسایی در کنشهای اجرایی را پیش بینی می کند.
نتیجه گیری: بر اساس یافته های این مطالعه ، می توان بر اساس مدل پردازش حسی مدل دان ، نارسایی در کنشهای اجرایی را پیش بینی کرد و ویژگی های شخصیتی ، به ویژه عامل برونگرایی ، نقش تعیین کننده ای در تقویت این رابطه دارند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Guarino A, Favieri F, Boncompagni I, Agostini F, Cantone M, Casagrande M. Executive functions in Alzheimer disease: a systematic review. Front Aging Neurosci 2019; 10: 437.
  2. Murdock KW, Oddi KB, Bridgett DJ. Cognitive correlates of personality. Pers Individ Dif 2013; 34: 97-104.
  3. Friedman NP, Miyake A. Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex 2017; 86: 186-204.
  4. Nemeth DG, Chustz KM. Executive functions defined. Evaluation and treatment of neuropsychologically compromised children. Phildelphia: Elsevier; 2020: 107-20.
  5. Vernon-Feagans L, Willoughby M, Garrett-Peters P. Predictors of behavioral regulation in kindergarten: household chaos, parenting, and early executive functions. Dev Psychol 2016; 52(3): 430.
  6. Miyake A, Friedman NP. The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2012; 21(1): 8-14.
  7. Banich MT. Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2009; 18(2):
    89-94.
  8. Snyder HR, Miyake A, Hankin BL. Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: Bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches. Front Psychol 2015;6:328.
  9. Azizian M. [Educational interventions in executive functions in children with cognitive disabilities]. Exceptional education journal 2018; 1(150): 63-71. (Persian)
  10. Kane MJ, Conway ARA, Hambrick DZ, Engle RW. Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In: Conway ARA, Jarrold C, Kane MJ, Miyake A, Towse JN. (editors). Variation in working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007: 21-46.
  11. Diamond A, Lee K. Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science 2011; 333(6045): 959-64.
  12. Voelcker-Rehage C, Niemann C. Structural and functional brain changes related to different types of physical activity across the life span. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013; 37(9): 2268-95.
  13. Baune BT, Fuhr M, Air T, Hering C. Neuropsychological functioning in adolescents and young adults with major depressive disorder–a review. Psychiatry Res 2014; 218(3): 261-71.
  14. Broidy LM, Nagin DS, Tremblay RE, Bates JE, Brame B, Dodge KA, et al. Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a six-site, cross-national study. Dev Psychol 2003; 39(2): 222.
  15. Riggs NR, Blair CB, Greenberg MT. Concurrent and 2-year longitudinal relations between executive function and the behavior of 1st and 2nd grade children. Child Neuropsychol 2004; 9(4): 267-76.
  16. Sinzig J, Morsch D, Bruning N, Schmidt MH, Lehmkuhl G. Inhibition, flexibility, working memory and planning in autism spectrum disorders with and without comorbid ADHD-symptoms. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2008; 2(1): 4.
  17. Pellicano E. Individual differences in executive function and central coherence predict developmental changes in theory of mind in autism. Dev Psychol 2010; 46(2): 530.
  18. Nigg JT. What causes ADHD?: Understanding what goes wrong and why. New York: Guilford; 2006.
  19. Dramsdahl M, Westerhausen R, Haavik J, Hugdahl K, Plessen KJ. Cognitive control in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 2011; 188(3): 406-10.
  20. McCloskey G, Perkins LA, Van Diviner B. Assessment and intervention for executive function difficulties: USA: Taylor and Francis; 2008.
  21. Hoseini J, Ashori M, Zarandi A. [Investigation of relationship of the executive functions with personality traits and self-concept in high school students]. Empowering exceptional children 2017; 7(4): 76-86. (Persian)
  22. Vaughan RS, Edwards EJ. Executive function and personality: The moderating role of athletic expertise. Pers Individ Dif 2020; 161: 109973.
  23. Buchanan T. Self-report measures of executive function problems correlate with personality, not performance-based executive function measures, in nonclinical samples. Psychol Assess 2016; 28(4): 372.
  24. Bell T, Hill N, Stavrinos D. Personality determinants of subjective executive function in older adults. Aging Ment Health 2019; 24(2): 1-10.
  25. Crow AJ. Associations between neuroticism and executive function outcomes: response inhibition and sustained attention on a Continuous Performance Test. Percept Mot Skills 2019; 126(4): 623-38.
  26. Campbell AM, Davalos DB, McCabe DP, Troup LJ. Executive functions and extraversion. Pers Individ Dif 2011; 51(6): 720-5.
  27. Muris P, Bos AE, Mayer B, Verkade R, Thewissen V, Dell’Avvento V. Relations among behavioral inhibition, Big Five personality factors, and anxiety disorder symptoms in non-clinical children. Pers Individ Dif 2009; 46(4): 525-9.
  28. Şengül-İnal G, Kirimer-Aydinli F, Sümer N. The role of attachment insecurity and big five traits on sensory processing sensitivity. J Psychol 2018; 152(7): 497-514.
  29. Smolewska KA, McCabe SB, Woody EZ. A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”. Pers Individ Dif 2006; 40(6): 1269-79.
  30. Sadoughi Z, Vafaei M, Rasoulzadeh TK. The Association of sensory-processing sensitivity with parenting styles and indices of psychopathology. Adv Cognit Sci 2007; 9(1): 23-32.
  31. Devlin S, Healy O, Leader G, Hughes BM. Comparison of behavioral intervention and sensory-integration therapy in the treatment of challenging behavior.J Autism Dev Disord 2011; 41(10): 1303-20.
  32. Miller L, Lane S. Toward a consensus in terminology in sensory integration theory and practice: Part 1: Taxonomy of neurophysiological processes. Sensory integration special interest section quarterly 2000; 23(1): 1-4.
  33. Dunn W. The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55(6): 608-20.
  34. Brown C, Dunn W. Adolescent/adult sensory profile. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2002.
  35. Ben-Avi N, Almagor M, Engel-Yeger B. Sensory processing difficulties and interpersonal relationships in adults: an exploratory study. Am Psychol 2012; 3: 70.
  36. Grimen HL, Diseth Å. Sensory processing sensitivity: Factors of the highly sensitive person scale and their relationships to personality and subjective health complaints. Comp Psychol 2016; 5: 1-10.
  37. Lionetti F, Pastore M, Moscardino U, Nocentini A, Pluess K, Pluess M. Sensory processing sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. J Res Pers 2019; 81: 138-52.
  38. Adams JN, Feldman HM, Huffman LC, Loe IM. Sensory processing in preterm preschoolers and its association with executive function. Early Hum Dev 2015; 91(3): 227-33.
  39. Hebert K. The association between impulsivity and sensory processing patterns in healthy adults. Am J Occup Ther 2015; 78(4): 232-40.
  40. Soler N, Hardwick C, Perkes IE, Mohammad SS, Dossetor D, Nunn K, et al. Sensory dysregulation in tic disorders is associated with executive dysfunction and comorbidities. J Mov Disord 2019; 34(12): 1901-9.
  41. Shields GS, Moons WG, Tewell CA, Yonelinas AP. The effect of negative affect on cognition: Anxiety, not anger, impairs executive function. Emotion 2016; 16(6): 792.
  42. Engel-Yeger B, Dunn W. Exploring the relationship between affect and sensory processing patterns in adults. Am J Occup Ther 2011; 74(10): 456-64.
  43. Haren EG, Mitchell CW. Relationships between the Five-Factor Personality Model and coping styles. Psychology and education: An interdisciplinary journal 2003; 40(1): 38-49.
  44. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychol Assess 1992; 4(1): 5.
  45. Holden RR. Associations between the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a nonclinical sample. Psychol Rep 1992; 71(3-suppl): 1039-42.
  46. Mooradian TA, Nezlek JB. Comparing the NEO-FFI and Saucier's Mini-Markers as measures of the Big Five. Pers Individ Dif 1996; 21(2): 213-5.
  47. Garousi Farshi M, Mehriar AH, Ghazitabatabaei M. Standardization of the new neo personality test and analytical study of its characteristics and factor structure among students of Iranian universities. Quarterly journal of Al-Zahra University 2001; 39(11): 173-98. (Persian)
  48. Atashafrouz B. Predicting academic performance through attachment and personality traits. Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran. 2007. (Persian)
  49. Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. J Pers Disord 1990; 4(4): 362-71.
  50. Dunn W. Sensory profile: User's manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1999.
  51. Pohl PS, Dunn W, Brown C. The role of sensory processing in the everyday lives of older adults. Occup Ther J Res 2003; 23; 99-106.
  52. Aron EN, Aron A. Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997; 73(2): 345.
  53. Adlparvar AH, Mazaheri MA, Sadeghi MAM, Adlparvar A, Khodabakhsh S. [The relationship between sensory processing styles and marital satisfaction]. Journal of family research 2013; 9(3): 279-98. (Persian)
  54. Barkley R. Deficits in executive functioning scale (BDEFS). New York: Guilford; 2011.
  55. Barkley RA. The assessment of executive functioning using the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scales. Handbook of executive functioning. New York: Springer; 2014: 245-63.
  56. Allee-Smith PJ, Winters RR, Drake A, Joslin AK. Test review: Barkley deficits in executive functioning scale (BDEFS). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 2013.
  57. Mashhadi A, Mirdoraghi F, Hosainzadeh Z, Maleki, Hasani J, Hamzeloo M. [Factor structure, reliability and validity of Persian version of Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS)- Adult version]. Journal of clinical psycology 2015; 7(1): 51-62. (Persian)
  58. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51(6): 1173.
  59. Frazier PA, Tix AP, Barron KE. Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 2004; 51(1): 115.
  60. Bredemeier K, Warren SL, Berenbaum H, Miller GA, Heller W. Executive function deficits associated with current and past major depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 2016; 204: 226-33.
  61. Löckenhoff CE, Terracciano A, Ferrucci L, Costa Jr PT. Five‐factor personality traits and age trajectories of self‐rated health: The role of question framing. J Pers 2012; 80(2): 375-401.
  62. Schultz DP, Schultz SE. Theories of personality. Belmont: Cengage Learning; 2016.
  63. Rammsayer TH. Extraversion and dopamine: Individual differences in response to changes in dopaminergic activity as a possible biological basis of extraversion. Eur Psychol 1998; 3(1): 37-50.

 

 

مجله اصول بهداشت روانی
دوره 22، شماره 4
خرداد و تیر 1399
صفحه 225-235

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار